How Do I Set Up the Schrodinger Equation for This Wave Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter apigban
  • Start date Start date
apigban
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi! I am having some problems in setting up the Schrodinger equation for a particle described by the wave function:

\Psi = A sinh (x)

should I use the exponential form of the hyperbolic function?

[URL]http://62.0.5.135/upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/c/7/9c74b71126c6bb1f4d6b865019a2735e.png[/URL]


Also, for normalization, do you have any guides that show how to form the complex conjugate of the above function (i don't see the complex parts).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the problem with the Schroedinger equation? Are you using the time-independent version (I assume you should be), is there a potential energy associated with this wavefunction?

Further, the complex conjugate of a real valued function is just the real function again. So normalization should look something like:

1=A2 \intsinh2(x)dx
 
Last edited:
This is my solution to the normalization of the wave equation. I am sorry I am totally new at this.

[PLAIN]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/249293_246586558696823_100000364410765_866703_7618168_n.jpg

Is it correct? I just followed wikipedia's
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalizable_wave_function#Example_of_normalization

My question on the Schroedinger Eq. is that: Should i use the exponential form of the hyperbolic function? or does it matter if i use the hyperbolic? In the normalization above i used the exponential form.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When you use the wavefunction in the Schrodinger equation, it shouldn't matter what form (hyperbolic or exponential) you use. Your normalization is off however. The integral of sinh2(x) is:

Exponential form: \frac{1}{4} (exp(2x)/2+exp(-2x)/2-2x)
Hyperbolic form: \frac{1}{4} (sinh(2x) -2x)

Further, you need to take the integral only between o and L, the other parts can be ignored. I may be reading this wrong, but it seems like you tried to absorb the exponentials into A2 and ignored any actual integration.

Cheers,
-Malus
 
thanks! I did the integration. and found what the factor is. thanks also for pointing that hyperbolic or exponentials can be used!.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top