How Do I Solve a Logarithmic Equation with Parameters and Find the Value of x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation a*x + b*ln(x) = c for x, numerical techniques are recommended, particularly the Newton-Raphson method. This method can be implemented using any scientific calculator or software like Excel. The Lambert W function is also relevant, as it provides an inverse for specific logarithmic equations. Users should expect to perform several iterations to reach a solution. Understanding these methods will facilitate finding the value of x effectively.
abra
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I'm new in the forum and I'd need an help to solve this equation (sorry, I think it's quite easy but I'm not an expert of mathematics..):

a*x + b*ln(x) = c

where a, b, c are parameters and I need to find the value of x.

Do I need to use techniques of differential equations?

Thanks a lot for any help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to use Numerical Techniques.
Have u come across Newton Raphson method ? It should do just fine on this one.

-- AI
 
No, I've never used the Newton Raphson method.. thanks, i'll have a look to this technique, however, I suppose I need to use some maths softwares to compute the result, isn't it?
 
No. Any scientific calculator will work. You could also use Excel, if you choose.

Hopefully, you won't have to go through too many iterations.
 
There is also the "Lambert's W" function. It is defined specifically as "W(x) is the y satisfying yey= x". In other words, it is the inverse of the function xex.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top