How Do I Solve a Quadratic Regression for a Helicopter Jump Trajectory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter curiousguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regression
curiousguy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to figure this out for 2 weeks.
A helicopter is begins its horizontal motion 2500 ft from the center of a targe 30 ft above the target traveling at 40mph. The target ( a pile of boxes) is stacked 15 ft high off the ground. At the appropriate time, a person is to jump out of the helicopter and hit the target. For the purpose of this problem, my professor says do not consider the horizontal speed of the jumper. I am to find the quad formula and parabola that states 1) when the person should jump to hit the target, 2) the speed of the jumper upon impact with the target. HELP! I am soooo stuck. I cannot get the quad formula for this! I did convert mph to ft per sec. Is it rational to use 16 ftpersec^2 as "g", acceleration due to gravity? When I use it, and graph the parabola it doesn't come close to hitting the target. When I try to graph the parabola from a couple of coordinates I know, it won't do it. HELP!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why can't everyone just use the metric system?
Your first problem is that g is not -16ft/s^2 but more like
-32.19ft/s^2... try that
 
The professor has us using the falling body formula=- 1/2 32ft/s^2 + Init.Velocity + Init. Height(y intercept) That's why the -16 is there. I have narrowed down the problem I am having... its the initial velocity. Since I have been instructed to not take into account the horizontal movement of 40mph (of 58.57 ft/sec), then the parabola I come out with makes NO sense. It traces the maximum of the parabola to approx 90 ft, meaning when the guy jumps out of the helicopter, he first climbs up to 90 ft in the air, before gravity takes over and pulls him back down. Well, I know that's not right. I have spending the past 2 wks throwing stuff and jumping off of stuff just to figure out this problem! Oh, if only my grade weren't so important to me. But it is. Do you know what I am supposed to do about initial velocity? If I try to put in "0"x, it comes out to no solution. Arg. Thank you for the suggestion.. keep them coming.
 
The initial vertical velocity is zero since the helicopter is moving only in the horizontal direction.

cookiemonster
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top