How do i solve the following with or without use of logs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dell
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 3^x = x^2 cannot be solved algebraically and requires the Lambert W function for a solution. The transformation leads to the expression sqrt(3) = x^(1/x), which can be rewritten using logarithms. The numerical solution approximates to x = 1.0434693552, but this does not satisfy the original equation. There is only one real solution to the problem, and numerical methods are necessary to find it. The Lambert W function is essential for deriving the solution, confirming that no alternative algebraic methods exist.
Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
How do i solve the following with or without use of logs?
3^x=x^2

the problem being that i have x both in my exp and in my base, what i have done is taken each side and gotten

(3^x)^(1/x)=(x^2)^(1/x)
3=x^(2/x)
3^(1/2)=(x^(2/x))^(1/2)
sqrt(3)=x^(1/x)

0.5*ln(3)=(1/x)*ln(x)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't solve it algebraically. It can be solved in terms of a non-elementary function called the Lambert W function. Numerically the answer is -.6860267245.
 
on my calculator i can get x=1.0434693552 but cannot prove it, is there no other way other than Lambert W function?
 
No. That's it. Numerically, which is how the Lambert W function's values are gotten anyway. And your x=1.0434693552 doesn't solve 3x = x2.
 
no sorry my mistake, that was for another excercise,
i looked up lambert W functions and i got this


3x=x2
(31/2)x=x
1=x/(31/2)x =====> (31/2)=a
1=x/ax
1=x*e-x*ln(a)
-ln(a)=[(-ln(a)*x)*e(-ln(a)*x)

after applying W to each side

-ln(a)*x=W(-ln(a))
x=-W(-ln(a))/(ln(a))

is this correct, and also how do i get a numerical answer for this??
 
Last edited:
i found an online calculator that gave me the value, which looks right, but it only gives me one value and i believe there are 2. how can i work it out?
 
No, there is only 1 real value.
 
Back
Top