How Do Ice-Skating Twins Illustrate Conservation of Momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnchops32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving two ice-skating twins and the conservation of momentum. Twin A throws a backpack to Twin B, and the task is to determine their subsequent speeds after the throw. Participants emphasize the importance of not assuming masses will cancel and suggest assigning variables to the masses and velocities involved. They recommend using the conservation of momentum principle by equating the total momentum before and after the backpack is thrown. This approach allows for solving the problem systematically without oversimplifying the situation.
johnchops32
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there I am new to the forum and I have a HW assignment due at 1130 pm tonight, i know I am procrastinating :\ but physics is my weak point. I can not figure this question out if my life depended on it. Here it is:

Identical twins, each with mass 64.2 kg, are on ice skates and at rest on a frozen lake, which may be taken as frictionless. Twin A is carrying a backpack of mass 12.0 kg. She throws it horizontally at 3.50 m/s to Twin B. Neglecting any gravity effects, what are the subsequent speeds of Twin A and Twin B?

. They have the same mass, i know the masses should cancel correct? And we have to use the conservation of momentum . But can someone help me out ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do not assume masses will cancel. Assign letters to everything and work the conservation laws. Let the laws tell you what does and does not cancel out.

Pick a direction to be positive, since momentum is a vector. For each twin write down the momentum before and the momentum after and equate them. So for Alice (twin A):

before throwing the pack: ##p_i=(m+M)v_i=0##
after: ##p_f=Mv+mu##
... if m is the mass of the pack and M is the mass of Alice, u and v are the respective velocities. Since pf=pi you can find relationships between the masses and the speeds.

Bob gets an incoming pack mass m moving at speed u.
You should be able to do the rest.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top