Stargazing How Do Lasers Work in Telescopes to Capture Images of the Universe?

AI Thread Summary
Lasers in telescopes primarily serve to enhance optical calibration rather than capture images directly from distant celestial objects. The concept of using lasers to obtain images through reflected light is flawed, as maintaining a collimated beam over vast distances is impractical. Additionally, returning reflected beams without specialized mirrors, like those used in lunar ranging, poses significant challenges. The discussion highlights the complexity of using lasers in astronomy, emphasizing that they are not used for direct imaging of the universe. Overall, laser guide stars are a specialized application rather than a general imaging technique.
pvk21
Well I was watching this documentary.there was reference to laser telescope.it use laser to get images of universe.I know the basic principle.it shoots out laser is space and get images from reflected light.but is that lasers really powerful enough to get images of objects which are far in the universe?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
pvk21 said:
it shoots out laser is space and get images from reflected light.
I don't think that's what it is. You're probably thinking of this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_guide_star
Which uses a laser to help calibrate the optics.

You can't really use lasers like what you described, as it's impossible to maintain a tight, collimated beam over large distances, impossible to get a reflected beam that gets back to you without a dedicated mirror (like with the Lunar Ranging experiment), and most importantly, impossible to wait a number of years for your beam to get to the target, bounce back and hit the aperture of your telescope. All you have is a night.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Ohh.its much complicated than i saw it in documentary.
 
Bandersnatch said:
You can't really use lasers like what you described, as it's impossible to maintain a tight, collimated beam over large distances, impossible to get a reflected beam that gets back to you without a dedicated mirror (like with the Lunar Ranging experiment), and most importantly, impossible to wait a number of years for your beam to get to the target, bounce back and hit the aperture of your telescope. All you have is a night.
A small but relevant fraction of the photons in lunar laser ranging comes from the lunar surface around the retroreflectors. Not with such a nice timing as the surface is not completely flat, but I guess it could be possible to do lunar ranging without retroreflectors today.

Apart from that special application: yeah, laser guide stars.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top