How Do Light Waves Destructively Interfere in a Bubble Film?

AI Thread Summary
Destructive interference in a bubble film occurs when light waves reflected from the front and back surfaces of the film cancel each other out. The thickness of the bubble film is 165 nm, and the index of refraction is 1.3, affecting the wavelength of light within the film. For destructive interference, the thickness must equal a quarter of the wavelength of light in the medium, which is reduced by the refractive index. The relevant formula is thickness = 1/4 * wavelength, where the wavelength is adjusted for the index of refraction. Understanding these principles allows for the determination of which wavelengths will destructively interfere in the bubble film.
stickplot
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Ok so I've been thinking this problem over and over and I understand the problem and its concept but I don't know where to start someone please guide me through this

i know it will be destructive interference at 180 but I don't know what else to apply to the problem someone help please.Light waves of which wavelength will destructively interfere due to the thickness of the bubble film? The bubble film thickness is 165 nm, with an index of refraction of n = 1.3.

It also contains a picture just showing the different light waves

a= 430 nm
b= 650 nm
c= 860 nm
d= 285 nm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, part of the wave is reflected from the front surface and part from the back surface of the bubble and these two reflections interfere destructively?

If so, in order for the interference to be destructive the wave passing through the bubble thickness twice must be delayed by half a wavelength. Thus the thickness of the bubble is a quarter of a wavelength.

There is another wrinkle. The wavelength of the light decreases when it passes into the bubble material, by a factor of n. The thickness is a quarter of this reduced wavelength, but your answer should be expressed as its regular wavelength in air.
 
o ok. i now understand the concept well now, but how would i put that in a formula to see which one is destructing?
 
thickness = 1/4*wavelength
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top