How do magnets pull things if magnetic forces are incapable of doing work?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic forces themselves do not perform work, as stated in introductory physics texts. The acceleration of a paperclip towards a magnet is attributed to the influence of changing magnetic flux, which induces an electric field that does the work. This electric field is generated by the movement of charges, which can be related to the concept of spin. The discussion highlights the connection between magnetic fields and electric fields, suggesting that the work done on the paperclip is a result of these interactions. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the mechanics behind magnetic attraction.
Raziel2701
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
When a magnet pulls a paperclip, what exactly is doing work on the paperclip? It cannot be a magnetic force can it? I thought it was a very strong statement that I read in my intro physics book and even Griffiths(pg. 207) that magnetic forces do no work. So what is responsible for accelerating a paperclip towards a magnet?

Is it something related to the changing magnetic flux? Is there an electric field somewhere doing the work?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the guy on the second part of the thread who's touching on spin was getting closer to the point of my question. I still don't know what's responsible for the work we see when a paperclip gets pulled in by a magnet.
 
With magnetic fields, you always have charges which move in some way (spin is similar to a movement in that respect). Moving charges in magnetic fields are equivalent to stationary charges in a field which has an electric component.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top