How Do Negative Exponents Work in Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StupidGenius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents Negative
StupidGenius
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Recently in class (11 math) we explored exponents in negatives. My teacher placed a question on the board and it said

7*1/7^-7
( 7 times 1 over 7 to the power of -7 )

She said that in order to get rid of a negative, we must imagine that there is an imaginary "1" multipliying the fraction.

1/7^-7 *1

Then we must "flip" the fraction around to eliminate the negative exponent. so it will be

7*1*7^7/1

I am a type of person to want to to know why and how stuff are done, especially in the subject of math. I want to know the reasoning behind. Unfortunately i couldn't ask her that day, and then the weekend came and the problem still remains.
So now i know how to get ride of the negative exponent, but will someone explain to me where the imaginary"1" came from and will i be able to do this in any equation where a negative exponent is present?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Personally, I have never heard of the "imaginary one" but from how your teacher explained it, I think it makes the whole problem a lot harder than necessary. So here's my explanation: whenever a number is to a negative exponent, all you have to do is move it to the other side of the fraction to get rid of the negative. If the negative exponent is on the denominator, move it to the numerator and vice versa.
Ex. (2^5)/(3^-4) = (2^5)(3^4)
All I did was move 3^-4 from the denominator to the numerator, thus making it's negative exponent positive.
 
Makes sense, but that "1" still exists in the fraction if (2^5)(3^4)/1. But I see how it is sort of irrelevant. Thank you, now what if the number was not in a fraction and was just simply;
(7^-3)
will this be correct? 1/(7^3)
 
7^-3 = 1/7^3, yes.
 
The basic idea behind this is the equation

7^a 7^b = 7^{a+b}​

We know this is true for a and b both positive integers, so we'd like to make it true for other values too.

Put b=0 and the only solution is 7^0 = 1. Then put b=-a to see that

7^{-a} = \frac{7^0}{7^a} = \frac{1}{7^a}​
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top