How Do Object Space and Image Space Affect Lens Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the effective focal length and magnification for a lens with given parameters. The object distance is 200 mm, the object space index is 1.5, and the front focal length is -80 mm. The calculations reveal a magnification of -2/3, indicating the image is inverted. The effective focal length is determined to be approximately 53.33 mm. Understanding the optical spaces and the correct index of refraction is crucial for these calculations.
Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,175
Reaction score
7,625

Homework Statement


For an object distance z = 200 mm, an object space index n = 1.5, and a front focal length ff = −80 mm, what is the effective focal length f and the magnification m? Is the image upright or inverted?

Homework Equations


Lots and lots of gaussian and Newtonian imaging equations!
But I'm guessing one of the equations is: ##\frac{z}{f_f} = 1-\frac{1}{m}##

The Attempt at a Solution



My confusion here has to do with the optical spaces. Since z is positive, the object is to the right of the lens. But is the object space to the right of the lens as well? I've read in my book that optical spaces actually extend from negative infinity to positive infinity, but I don't quite understand it yet. Also, which index of refraction, n or n', is 1.5?

Nevermind, I'm stupid. They tell me it's ##n## right in the question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the equation above, I get:

##\frac{z}{f_f} = 1-\frac{1}{m} ##

##\frac{200}{-80} = 1-\frac{1}{m}##

## \frac{5}{2} = \frac{m-1}{m}##

##5m=2m-2##

##3m=-2##

##m=-\frac{2}{3}##
 
I'm stupid, they tell me ##n## right in the question. Using the following equation:

##\frac{z}{n}=\frac{1-m}{m}f_e##

Plugging in 1.5 for ##n##, 200 for ##z##, and ##-\frac{2}{3}## for m gives me 53.33 mm.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top