How Do Particle Accelerators Reveal the Structure of Matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter echelon4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
echelon4
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Help! Particle accelerators

I want to know what particle accelerators do but can't seem to find anything anywhere! I've been searching everywhere, but the answers are very vague.

My question is what do particle accelerators tell us about the structure/ behaviour matter? How do they do this?

I've seen answer like 'they disrupt the nucleus and act as a probe' etc, but i still don't get HOW this disruption will explain anything about the structure/behaviour of matter

Please help, I've got an assignment due and I'm stressing out!

Thanks in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
echelon4 said:
I want to know what particle accelerators do but can't seem to find anything anywhere! I've been searching everywhere, but the answers are very vague.

My question is what do particle accelerators tell us about the structure/ behaviour matter? How do they do this?

I've seen answer like 'they disrupt the nucleus and act as a probe' etc, but i still don't get HOW this disruption will explain anything about the structure/behaviour of matter

Please help, I've got an assignment due and I'm stressing out!

Thanks in advanced.

I have a feeling that what you want is not "particle accelerators" but rather "particle colliders". There's a difference.

Particle accelerators, by its name, accelerate particles up to a certain energy. What happens afterwards, or what you do with those accelerated particles depends on the mission of your work. At high energy physics laboratories such as CERN and Fermilab, they take these particles and collide them, thus the name "particle colliders". On the other hand, at various synchrotron centers, they take these accelerated particles and put them into a circular storage ring and let them go on and on and on and on... to produce light that is then use to study other things. The last thing they want is for this particles to collide and degrade its quality.

If you want to know what particle colliders do and how they study fundamental particles, you should go to the CERN or Fermilab websites.

Zz.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top