How Do Particles Interact in Quantum Field Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BucketOfFish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupling Qft
BucketOfFish
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
I'm an experimentalist, so go easy on me... What does it mean for a particle to either couple or not couple to a field? I haven't taken a class in QFT yet, so please try to explain the general idea without any details or equations!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As an experimentalist as well, my working understanding is that you may replace "couple" with "interact". E.g. W± couples with the electromagnetic field = W± interacts with the electromagnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes BucketOfFish
In the Lagrangian, the coupling between two fields is a term in which the two fields are multiplied together. A free scalar field has only up to quadratic terms, so if one adds cubic or higher order terms, those are sometimes said to be self-interaction terms. http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft/three.pdf gives an example of a self-interaction term (Eq 3.5), and an example of an interaction between two different types of fields (3.7)
 
  • Like
Likes BucketOfFish
BucketOfFish said:
I'm an experimentalist, so go easy on me... What does it mean for a particle to either couple or not couple to a field? I haven't taken a class in QFT yet, so please try to explain the general idea without any details or equations!

An example: particles with electric charge couple to the electromagnetic field. Electrically neutral particles do not couple to the electromagnetic field.
 
BucketOfFish said:
I'm an experimentalist, so go easy on me... What does it mean for a particle to either couple or not couple to a field? I haven't taken a class in QFT yet, so please try to explain the general idea without any details or equations!

The terminology is rather: free fields couple to each other, while particles interact with each other. So in QFT to say <a particle couples to a field> is illegal. Within classical electrodynamics we say <particles are acted upon by electromagnetic fields>.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
217
Replies
182
Views
14K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top