How Do Planets Orbit Stars in Elliptical Paths?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmstaples
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets Stars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating various orbital parameters of a planet in an elliptical orbit around a star. The semi-major axis is determined to be 1.2 x 10^11 m, leading to an orbital period of approximately 213.7 days. The eccentricity of the orbit is calculated as 1/3 using the polar equation of an ellipse. The orbital speeds at periastron and apastron are found to be around 58 km/s and 29 km/s, respectively. The discussion concludes with a demonstration that the specific angular momentum remains constant at both points in the orbit.
lmstaples
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A planet orbits a star of mass M = (3*10^30)kg in an elliptical orbit.
The planet is r_1 = (0.8*10^11)m from the star at its closest approach (periastron),
and r_2 = (1.6*10^11)m at its furthest (apastron).
(G = (6.67*10^-11) Nm^2kg^-2)

(a) Calculate the semi-major axis a, and hence the period T of the planet's orbit.

(b) Use the polar equation of an ellipse to calculate the orbital eccentricity, e.

(c) Use conservation of energy and the total orbital energy per unit mass of the planet (epsilon = -GM/2a),
to calculate the orbital speeds at the periastron and apastron, v_1 and v_2.

(d) Use your values of v_1 and v_2 to show that the orbital angular momentum per unit mass is the same at periastron and apastron.


Homework Equations


r = (l)/(1+ecos(θ))
a = (l)/(1-e^2)
h=sqrt(GMl)
ε=-(GM)/2a
v=rω
1/2(dr/dt)^2 + (h^2)/(2r^2) - (GM)/r = -(GM)/(2a)


The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have:
(a) a = (r_1 + r_2)/2 = (1.2*10^11)m and T = sqrt((4pi^2(a^3))/(GM)) = (18464102.11)s = (213.7)days

(b) r = (L)/(1 + e*cos(theta)) and a = (L)/(1-e^2) => L = a(1-e^2) => r = (a(1-e^2))/(1+e*cos(theta))
get a quadratic in e and solve to get e = 1/3

(c) not getting anywhere. know that 1/2(dr/dt)^2 + (h^2)/(2r^2) - (GM)/r = -(GM)/(2a)

(d) no idea
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(c) hint: total energy is the sum of kinetic and potential energy.
(d) having got the speeds in (c) use the angular momentum formula.
 
Haha thanks, I worked it out in the end - was being stupid.
Ended up with v_1 around 58km/s and v_2 around 29km/s. Then for (d) showed that specific angular momentum was the same for both periastron and apastron using r_1v_1 =r_2v_2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top