How Do Sign Conventions Affect Calculating Net Force on Charges?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of net force on charges, emphasizing the importance of sign conventions in determining the direction of forces. It highlights that both attractive forces from positive charges on a negative charge must be balanced for equilibrium. The correct application of algebra and the inclusion of squared distances in the force equations are crucial for accurate results. Additionally, the conversation clarifies that the sign of the force indicates attraction or repulsion, while the direction is determined by the arrangement of charges. Understanding these principles is essential for correctly calculating net forces in electrostatics.
JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
F=9E9 *(q1q2/r)
So 0=q1q3/r+q2q3/(13.6-r)

0=-8.5/r-3.63/13.6+3.63/r

0.2669=3.63/r-8.5/r

r=-18.2465, but the answer is supposed to be 8.24
 

Attachments

  • Question.PNG
    Question.PNG
    8.2 KB · Views: 157
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you figured out that the minus charge must be placed between the two positive charges. Both forces are attractive. The first charge pulls charge 3 to the left, giving it a negative sign. The second charge pulls charge 3 to the right=that force is positive.

Meanwhile you need an exponent of 2 on the distances in the denominator.

Your algebra is also incorrect. e.g. ## 6/(4-2) \neq 6/4-6/2 ##.
 
Last edited:
Charles Link said:
I think you figured out that the minus charge must be placed between the two positive charges. Both forces are attractive. The first charge pulls charge 3 to the left, giving it a negative sign. The second charge pulls charge 3 to the right=that force is positive.

Meanwhile you need an exponent of 2 on the distances in the denominator.

Your algebra is also incorrect. e.g. ## 6/(4-2) \neq 6/4-6/2 ##.

Are they not both negative though, because q1*q3 and q2*q3 are both negative?
 
Last edited:
Charles Link said:
I think you figured out that the minus charge must be placed between the two positive charges. Both forces are attractive. The first charge pulls charge 3 to the left, giving it a negative sign. The second charge pulls charge 3 to the right=that force is positive.

Meanwhile you need an exponent of 2 on the distances in the denominator.

Your algebra is also incorrect. e.g. ## 6/(4-2) \neq 6/4-6/2 ##.

I get the right answer as you've said when I make one positive and fix my algebra, but could you explain further why its positive? I understand it pulls the charge to the right, but I was under the impression that, from the equation below, it was the charges that delineated a positive or negative sign.

F = k \frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}
 
JoeyBob said:
I get the right answer as you've said when I make one positive and fix my algebra, but could you explain further why its positive? I understand it pulls the charge to the right, but I was under the impression that, from the equation below, it was the charges that delineated a positive or negative sign.

F = k \frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}
That formula only gives the magnitude. The vector form includes r as a vector, e.g. ##\frac{kq_1q_2}{r^3}\vec r##. For the two cases, the r vector is pointing opposite ways.
 
haruspex said:
That formula only gives the magnitude. The vector form includes r as a vector, e.g. ##\frac{kq_1q_2}{r^3}\vec r##. For the two cases, the r vector is pointing opposite ways.

So the vector from the first charge interaction would be r/r i hat and from the second charge interaction (r-13.6)/sqrt(r-13.6)^2 *i hat. The first would remain positive and cancel, but the second would be negative and cancel because we know r is smaller than 13.6 and a negative divided by the absolute value of a positive is negative.

Is this correct?
 
@haruspex wrote it with an ## \vec{r} ## in the numerator, and an ## r^3 ##, in the denominator, but when you are first getting started, you are better to look at it as a unit vector divided by ## r^2 ##. If you got the correct answer, I believe you now have the right idea.

As he pointed out, you only get the amplitude of the force from the formula. You then determine which way the force points, (left or right), and put the sign on there accordingly.
 
JoeyBob said:
Are they not both negative though, because q1*q3 and q2*q3 are both negative?
May I add my two-penn’orth?

The confusion comes from mixing two different sign-conventions and is easily avoided.

When using ##F = \frac{kq_1q_2}{r^2} ##we are using a radial sign-convention. A positive value of F means outwards (repulsion); a negative value of F means inwards (attraction). Positive or negative values of F do not tell us if F acts in the +x or -x directions; that needs a different sign-convention.

When you have charges along a line it's often simplest to consider the magnitudes of the forces. In this question we have the arrangement:
[+q₁] [-q₃] [+q₂]
For zero force on q₃ we need the 2 attractive forces on it to balance:
|F₁₃| = |F₂₃|

Also worth noting is that answers should have units and be rounded to the appropriate number of significant figures.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Back
Top