Charles Link said:I think you figured out that the minus charge must be placed between the two positive charges. Both forces are attractive. The first charge pulls charge 3 to the left, giving it a negative sign. The second charge pulls charge 3 to the right=that force is positive.
Meanwhile you need an exponent of 2 on the distances in the denominator.
Your algebra is also incorrect. e.g. ## 6/(4-2) \neq 6/4-6/2 ##.
Charles Link said:I think you figured out that the minus charge must be placed between the two positive charges. Both forces are attractive. The first charge pulls charge 3 to the left, giving it a negative sign. The second charge pulls charge 3 to the right=that force is positive.
Meanwhile you need an exponent of 2 on the distances in the denominator.
Your algebra is also incorrect. e.g. ## 6/(4-2) \neq 6/4-6/2 ##.
That formula only gives the magnitude. The vector form includes r as a vector, e.g. ##\frac{kq_1q_2}{r^3}\vec r##. For the two cases, the r vector is pointing opposite ways.JoeyBob said:I get the right answer as you've said when I make one positive and fix my algebra, but could you explain further why its positive? I understand it pulls the charge to the right, but I was under the impression that, from the equation below, it was the charges that delineated a positive or negative sign.
![]()
haruspex said:That formula only gives the magnitude. The vector form includes r as a vector, e.g. ##\frac{kq_1q_2}{r^3}\vec r##. For the two cases, the r vector is pointing opposite ways.
May I add my two-penn’orth?JoeyBob said:Are they not both negative though, because q1*q3 and q2*q3 are both negative?