How do spin measurements of particles relate to complex amplitudes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between spin measurements of particles and complex amplitudes. It begins with a specific state for measuring the spin in the x-direction, expressed as a superposition of spin states. The goal is to determine the amplitudes for measuring spin in the z-direction, questioning why the phase angle φ is set to zero. The conversation highlights that multiplying an eigenstate by a complex number does not change the eigenstate, but emphasizes the importance of the ratio of complex amplitudes for different spin measurements. Ultimately, the calculations reveal that the ratio for measuring s_z yields a value of 1, while for s_y, it results in i.
Grand
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Say we want to fiddle with spin of a particle.

The state in which a measurement of s_x is certain to yield +1/2 is:
|+,x\rangle=\sin{\frac{\pi}{4}}e^{i 0}|-\rangle+\cos{\frac{\pi}{4}}e^{-i 0}|+\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|-\rangle+\+|+\rangle)

Now, for this state, we want to find the amplitude for measuring s_z to be either 1/2 or -1/2. We have to apply the bra
\langle+,s_z|=sin0e^{i\phi/2}\langle-|+cos0e^{i\phi/2}\langle+|

What I want to ask about is why in here \phi=0 as well - it is the z direction, which is determined only by \theta=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Grand! :wink:

If you multiply any eigenstate by an ordinary complex number, don't you get the same eigenstate?
 
Yes, we do. The probability is computed as mod squared of the amplitude. But here we have to show that the ratio of the complex amplitudes to measure the momentum s_z to be 1/2 and -1/2 is 1 and for the same calculation, but for y it is i.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top