How Do Standard Deviations Change with Multiple Measurements in Pendulum Timing?

AI Thread Summary
Sally measures the period of a pendulum once, obtaining a standard deviation \sigmaS. Bob measures the period twice, averaging his results, which leads to a standard deviation of \sigmaB equal to \sigmaS divided by the square root of 2. Charlie conducts ten measurements and averages them, resulting in a standard deviation \sigmaC of \sigmaS divided by the square root of 10. The discussion highlights how increasing the number of measurements reduces the standard deviation, reflecting improved accuracy in the results. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate experimental analysis in physics.
pearldrumbum
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Sally, Bob and Charlie each measure the period of the same pendulum to determine the
acceleration of gravity, g. The lab instructions say that you should determine the period by
timing the time of 100 swings (complete cycles) of the pendulum. Sally is the first to do the
experiment and she times 100 swings of the pendulum. Bob does the experiment next and
decides to make two such measurements of 100 swings each and averages the values to get a
better result while Charlie decides to make 10 sets of measurements and average them. The
final data set consists of three times (TS, TB, and TC) for 100 swings. Assume that the dominant
uncertainty in timing the 100 swings is random and that all three students have the same
reaction time.
If Sally obtains a standard deviation \sigmaS, what are the standard deviations calculated by
Bob and Charlie (\sigmaB and \sigmaC) expressed in units or multiples of \sigmaS?


Homework Equations



\sigma = sqrt[(sum(x-xavg)2)/(N-1)]
where N is number of trials, x is each measured value and xavg is the mean of the measured values.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not quite sure where to start with this because I don't know how sally could have gotten a standard deviation with only one measurement.
I feel like this should be pretty simple, but I must be overlooking something easy or misreading the question. I would like to figure this out on my own, but I can't seem to even get out of the batters box, so if maybe if someone could just get me started, I think i could finish on my own.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bob gets two data for the time of 100 swings t1 and t2, with standard deviations \sigma_S_ {t1}[/itex] \sigma_S_ {t2}[/itex] both supposedly equal to Sally's \sigma_S [/itex] and calculates both the average time and the standard deviation of the final value TB. The final time is the average of t1 and t2. <br /> <br /> TB=0.5*(t1+t2). <br /> <br /> Then he uses this formula to get the standard variation of TB: <br /> <br /> This is<br /> <br /> \sqrt {(\frac{\partial TB}{\partial t1})^2*\sigma_{t1}^2+(\frac{\partial TB}{\partial t1})^2*\sigma_{t1}^2}=\sqrt{2(0.5)^2\sigma_S^2}=\sigma_S/\sqrt 2<br /> <br /> Charlie gets his standard derivation with the same method, but calculates the average from three measurements. <br /> <br /> ehild
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top