How Do Stoichiometric Coefficients Affect Gibbs Free Energy Calculations?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the impact of stoichiometric coefficients on Gibbs free energy calculations and the equilibrium constant for a specific chemical reaction. Participants explore how different representations of the same reaction can lead to different Gibbs free energy values and equilibrium constant expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a reaction and expresses confusion over calculating Gibbs free energy using different stoichiometric coefficients, questioning which calculation is correct.
  • Another participant notes that the equilibrium constant expressions differ based on the stoichiometry used, emphasizing the importance of a balanced reaction when providing equilibrium constants.
  • A third participant agrees that both stoichiometric representations are valid, suggesting that clarity from the professor is necessary to determine which should be used in their specific case.
  • A later reply expresses relief at the confirmation that both approaches are correct, indicating a shared understanding of the confusion surrounding the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both stoichiometric representations are valid and that the choice depends on the context provided by the instructor. However, there is no consensus on which specific representation should be used in their homework.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the definitions of stoichiometric coefficients and the need for clarity in specifying which representation is required for calculations. There are unresolved aspects regarding how these different representations affect the interpretation of Gibbs free energy and equilibrium constants.

Puchinita5
Messages
178
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the reaction N2(g) + 3H2(g) <---> 2NH3(g)

I am supposed to determine the equilibrium constant at 298K and 1 bar. We have been given a table that states that

for NH3(g):
\Delta_{r}G^{\Theta}= -16.45 kJ/mol

I know that
\Delta_{r}G^{\Theta}= \Sigma v G^{\Theta}_{product} - \Sigma v G^{\Theta}_{reactant}

where v is the stoichiometric coefficient.

But what is confusing me is that you could also write the equation as

1/2 N2(g) + (3/2)(g) <----> NH3(g)

so in the first case, the answer would be

(2*-16.45 kJ/mol) - ((1*0)+(3*0)) = -32.90 kJ/mol

But in the second case, the answer would be

(-16.45 kJ/mol) - (1/2*0 + 3/2 *0) = -16.45 kJ/mol

Since both equations should be valid, what answer is correct? I don't understand which one I should choose because they both look like the should be right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the two cases, the expression for the equilibrium constant will be different. In the first case K = [NH3]^2/[N2]

^3 whereas in the second case K = [NH3]/[N2]^(1/2)

^(3/2). This is why you always need to include a balanced reaction along with any equilibrium constant you provide.

 
Hey, I had the same concern. They are both right; it depends on the stoichiometry. The professor would have to specify which one he is looking for like he did last time.
 
Thanks guys! Did he specify last time? I must not have understood him. This was really confusing me, good to know that both are right! I feel better now. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K