How do they date ancient times?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blahness
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Dating ancient times relies on various methods beyond carbon dating, particularly radiometric dating using isotopes with long half-lives, which can yield significant error margins over billions of years. The accuracy of these techniques is often a fraction of the isotope's half-life, leading to potential errors of hundreds of millions of years for very old samples. Paleo-magnetism is another crucial method, utilizing Earth's magnetic field reversals recorded in rocks to date geological formations. Additionally, identifying fossils, especially from short-lived species, provides a reliable dating framework, as evidenced by extensive databases like the Sepkoski Compendium. Other short-term dating techniques include dendrochronology and varve counting, among others, enhancing the understanding of Earth's timeline.
Blahness
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
I mean billions of years ago, when carbon dating is too inaccurate.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
There are other dating methods aside from just carbon dating. I'm going to recommend this topic get moved to the "Earth" forum since your question addresses more than just organisms.
 
Sorry for the wrong location, it was the first place I could think of. X.X


What is the accuracy of this dating?
 
HERE is more on long-term radioactive dating, but essentially the accuracy is a fraction of the half-life of the isotope you are using, not a specific number of years. So if one dating technique gives a 10% error over 3 billion years, that's a possible error of 300 million years. Obviously, such a technique wouldn't work too well if you want to measure the age of something that is only 30 million years old.
 
Error margins of radiometric dating are order of magnitude of 1%, which is rather disturbing when trying to find out what is cause and what is effect.

Another important tool for dating of very old stratifocations is paleo-magnetism. As the Earth magnetic field has reversed many times, this is recorded in the rocks and an excellent record of these reversals is available. So many scientists earn their living with investigating sediments for magnetic polarisation, trying to identify those reversals.

Yet another dating method is identificing fossils. Many extinct species like planktonic type of micro-organisms that fossilize easily, did have a short livespan. The Sepkoski Compendium (Bulletin American Paleontology no. 363, Ithaca 2002) contains 36,380 of those "marine genera" (single: genus, a group of closely related species) dated back to 540 million years ago.

For the short term there are loads of additional methods, dendrochronology, varve counting (yearly lake sediment layers), Ice core layers and contents, volcanic glass layers (tephra) of known eruptions, thermo - opto illuminicense, wiggle matching and what have you.
 
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
Back
Top