How Do Ultrasonic Transducers Calculate Maximum Amplitude and Speed in SHM?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wayveon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm Ultrasonic
AI Thread Summary
Ultrasonic transducers in medical imaging operate at 0.8 MHz and have a maximum restoring force of 34,000 N. To calculate the maximum oscillation amplitude without damaging the disk, the relationship between kinetic energy and restoring force is analyzed. The maximum speed at this amplitude can be derived using the formula Vmax = (2π)(f)(A). There is confusion regarding the interpretation of kinetic energy in relation to restoring force, with suggestions to focus on acceleration to find amplitude. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in applying equations related to simple harmonic motion.
wayveon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An ultrasonic transducer, of the type used in medical ultrasound imaging, is a very thin disk (m = 0.14 g) driven back and forth in SHM at 0.8 MHz by an electromagnetic coil.

(a) The maximum restoring force that can be applied to the disk without breaking it is 34,000 N. What is the maximum oscillation amplitude that won't rupture the disk? (in micrometers)

(b) What is the disk's maximum speed at this amplitude? (in m/s)

Homework Equations


Kinetic Energy - (1/2)(m)(v^2)
Vmax = (2pi)(f)(A)

The Attempt at a Solution


I wasn't sure whether I should be interpreting this as as spring or not, since we haven't gotten to magnets yet. So i just though, simple harmonic system have constant total energy curves, and interpreted the maximum kinetic energy of the system as being equivalent of the restoring force.

KE = (1/2)(m)(Vmax^2)

34000N = (1/2)(0.00014kg)[[2pi(0.8E6 Hz)(A)]^2]

A = sqrt( [(34000*2)/0.00014kg] / [[2pi(0.8E6 Hz)]^2] ) = 4.384e-3m, which isn't right for a. Oddly, I can see that if i don't do the square root and instead just divide the resulting quantity by two, I get the correct answer. Makes me suspect that the original solution was programmed wrong, simply slip of a ^ to a *, but I doubt myself.
Where am I going wrong with interpreting this problem? I've looked at other solutions, e.g. this one, but I haven't seen some of the other equations before frankly.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
wayveon said:
So i just though, simple harmonic system have constant total energy curves, and interpreted the maximum kinetic energy of the system as being equivalent of the restoring force.

This makes no sense to me, equating k.e. to restoring force. Instead:

SHM is x = Acos(wt), right?
So compute d2x/dt2 which reveals max. acceleration. Then, Fmax = m*amax which will give you A.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top