How do we know that light is a wave

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cnidocyte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Wave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical and theoretical understanding of light as a wave, including its properties and the evolution of theories regarding its nature. Participants explore the wave model of light, its limitations, and the transition to quantum theory, while referencing key historical figures and experiments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Historical
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the wave model of light is insufficient to explain phenomena like the photoelectric effect and black body radiation, leading to the development of quantum theory.
  • One participant suggests starting with Christiaan Huygens as a foundational figure in the wave theory of light.
  • It is mentioned that light exhibited wavelike properties such as polarization and diffraction around 1800, which were predicted by earlier wave theories from the 1600s.
  • Another participant states that light has properties that classify it as a wave.
  • Historical context is provided regarding Newton's particle theory of light and the contemporaneous debate with Huygens, highlighting the significance of Thomas Young's double slit experiment in challenging Newton's views.
  • One participant references Maxwell's equations, indicating that solutions to these equations describe propagating waves of electric and magnetic fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of light, with some supporting the wave model and others acknowledging its limitations. The discussion reflects ongoing debate regarding the wave versus particle nature of light, with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to historical developments and key experiments but does not resolve the complexities surrounding the wave and particle theories of light.

cnidocyte
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I'm reading a bit about atomic theory at the moment and I keep reading about how the wave model of light is not sufficient to explain things like the photoelectric effect and black body radiation, which is where quantum theory stepped in but I haven't seen any mention of where the wave theory came from.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Here's the guy who started it all - a good place to start

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiaan_Huygens"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
russ_watters said:
Light was first noticed to have wavelike properties such as poliarization and diffraction around 1800 as predicted by the initial wave theory which originated in the 1600s: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light#Wave_theory

Ah right I didn't even think about diffraction thanks.
 
Because it has a property that belongs to a class we call wave.
 
Newton was an advocate of light as a particle (they were called corpuscles back then, I believe). Newton and Huygens were contemporaries and knew of each other's work. So the debate over the nature of light (wave vs. particle) goes way back...

I think it is usually credited to Thomas Young and the double slit expirement that put an end to Newton's corpuscular theory of light. Until Einstein and his explanation the photoelectric effect -- for which he received the Nobel Prize.
 
it also follows from maxwells equations. a solution to these is a propagating wave for electric and magnetic field
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K