Medical How Do We Perceive the World: Are Our Eyes Better Than Cameras?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Routaran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perception
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how humans perceive the world and the comparison between visual perception and camera functionality. It clarifies that the eye does not capture "frames" like a camera; instead, it continuously receives input from photoreceptors, which the brain processes to create a composite image. This process is not entirely accurate, as the brain often fills in gaps and interprets visual information based on prior knowledge, leading to phenomena like blind spots. The conversation also touches on the effectiveness of magic tricks, emphasizing that they rely on misdirection and illusion rather than just speed, highlighting the limitations of human perception compared to the instantaneous nature of camera snapshots.
Routaran
Messages
447
Reaction score
94
Hey all,
I am curious. I was discussing magic tricks earlier today and how the "hand is faster than the eye." It got me thinking. How exactly do we perceive the world around us? Does the brain take frames from each eye and amalgamate them to produce a 3d model of the world around us like a video camera in a sense or is it a continuous image with no gaps?

Reason i ask is that the claim was made that its easier to fool a camera than the eye, which I disagreed with. But didn't have a good reason for holding that position as i don't know exactly how we see things. I would like to know why i am right/wrong.

Thanks
 
Biology news on Phys.org
As I understand it, it takes the eye about 200 ms to respond to an unexpected stimulus and then still another 20-200 ms to take in what's there.

There's more info for instance on wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccade
 
Routaran said:
Hey all,
I am curious. I was discussing magic tricks earlier today and how the "hand is faster than the eye." It got me thinking. How exactly do we perceive the world around us? Does the brain take frames from each eye and amalgamate them to produce a 3d model of the world around us like a video camera in a sense or is it a continuous image with no gaps?

Reason i ask is that the claim was made that its easier to fool a camera than the eye, which I disagreed with. But didn't have a good reason for holding that position as i don't know exactly how we see things. I would like to know why i am right/wrong.

Thanks

The eye doesn't take "frames" as such, when a camera takes a picture it is a snapshot of what all the receptors are sensing at one time. With the eye your http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_cell" are constantly firing and not all as a group.

The brain takes all of these images and builds a picture. However this picture is not a faithful one, the brain is constantly trying to match what it sees to what it knows (ever thought you've seen a person out of the corner of your eye but when your head turns it's a coat?), this is demonstrated by the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_spot_(vision)" our optic nerve has to tunnel through our photoreceptors, consequently our brain "fills in" what it thinks is in this blind spot.

With regards to magic tricks it is not often that the trick involves the hand moving fast, normally it also involves showmanship, misdirection and illusion. For an example of how much faster your hand can go compared to your brains ability to build a composite picture just shake your hand really fast in front of your eye.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top