How Do Wireless Digital Transmissions Work and What Affects Their Quality?

AI Thread Summary
Wireless digital transmissions are utilized in devices like remotes, phones, and Wi-Fi, with signal strength diminishing over distance due to the inverse square law. Digital signals can be transmitted at a specific frequency, but modulation techniques are often employed, similar to analog signals. Not all digital transmissions are encrypted; many remote controls use unencrypted codes, allowing for the creation of universal remotes. Infrared remotes typically use optical signals, which can be analyzed with devices like infrared cameras or oscilloscopes to capture binary data. Understanding these principles can aid in building custom receivers for various devices.
jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
For some reason I can't find any satisfying answers to my questions on the internet.

1. Are mostly all remotes, phones, wifi, etc. using wireless digital transmission? If so, why does a wifi signal get weaker when you move further away? The inverse square law shouldn't apply to a digital signal as long as it makes it to the receiver, right?

2. Do digital transmissions only require one specific frequency rather than a range of frequencies like analog? For example, you could just send pulses at 800Mhz exactly and have your receiver set to the same frequency.

3. Are wireless digital transmissions always encrypted in some way? If so, is there anyway to get the codes? For example, if i wanted to build a receiver (other than the TV) for my Samsung TV remote, could I? Or would Samsung keep that info secret?

4. What is the best way to read a wireless signal? Say i wanted to know the binary signal sent from my remote when I press a specific button, how could I read out the binary digits?

Thanks a bunch!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Jd0g33 said:
1. Are mostly all remotes, phones, wifi, etc. using wireless digital transmission? If so, why does a wifi signal get weaker when you move further away? The inverse square law shouldn't apply to a digital signal as long as it makes it to the receiver, right?
Most remotes use IR: that's what the little lens on the end of the remote is for. The others are radio/microwave frequency. They are very different from each other.

The signal in wifi/cell phones is weaker with distance because of the inverse square law, but the quality doesn't suffer until it gets so weak that it can't be reliably detected.
2. Do digital transmissions only require one specific frequency rather than a range of frequencies like analog? For example, you could just send pulses at 800Mhz exactly and have your receiver set to the same frequency.
Digital signals are modulated in ways somewhat similar to the way analog signals are:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-sequence_spread_spectrum
3. Are wireless digital transmissions always encrypted in some way? If so, is there anyway to get the codes? For example, if i wanted to build a receiver (other than the TV) for my Samsung TV remote, could I? Or would Samsung keep that info secret?
Some are, some aren't. A remote's codes are not encrypted, otherwise universal remotes couldn't be made.
4. What is the best way to read a wireless signal? Say i wanted to know the binary signal sent from my remote when I press a specific button, how could I read out the binary digits?
Again, most remotes are infrared. You could probably record them with an infrared camera or other IR receiver. They also tend to be analog:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_control#Technique
 
Jd0g33 said:
For some reason I can't find any satisfying answers to my questions on the internet.

1. Are mostly all remotes, phones, wifi, etc. using wireless digital transmission? If so, why does a wifi signal get weaker when you move further away? The inverse square law shouldn't apply to a digital signal as long as it makes it to the receiver, right?

It is still a signal carried by radio waves. The original name for radio was "wireless." As you know radio waves get weaker with distance and the modulation dies with it.

2. Do digital transmissions only require one specific frequency rather than a range of frequencies like analog? For example, you could just send pulses at 800Mhz exactly and have your receiver set to the same frequency.

Digital transmissions can be a single frequency that is turned on and off (like morse code) or frequency shifted to provide pulse code modulated (digital) data. The High priority encrypted communication across the pacific used time division Frequency Shift Keyed (FSK) transmissions at around 50 mHz. Other data systems used AM Frequency Division Modulation for data transmissions.

3. Are wireless digital transmissions always encrypted in some way? If so, is there anyway to get the codes? For example, if i wanted to build a receiver (other than the TV) for my Samsung TV remote, could I? Or would Samsung keep that info secret?

Most Remote controls are optical. No WIFI. Different codes can be used on specific units to keep optical TV remotes from triggering the wrong functions or other devices. There are universal remotes that are programmable. Most remote controlled devices come with a specific remote for the device. It is conceivable that you could make an optical receiver that can be programmed to respond to the codes from a remote and do whatever you want it to do.

4. What is the best way to read a wireless signal? Say i wanted to know the binary signal sent from my remote when I press a specific button, how could I read out the binary digits?

The Wireless and Bluetooth signals are radio frequency. The signal for most remotes are light outside of our vision range. You can use a storage oscilloscope and a photo sensor to see the data patterns of an optical remote. I use a cell phone camera to check optical controllers. Thanks a bunch!
 
There are plenty of hobbyist "IR Remote Control Hackers"

try searching on that phrase, both with and without IR.

http://www.interlockroc.org/2012/07/20/remote-control-hacking/
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top