How do you apply Gauss's Law at an interface with different permittivities?

AI Thread Summary
To apply Gauss's Law at an interface with different permittivities, one must consider the surface charge density and use the integral form of the law for appropriate geometries. By integrating over a small cube that straddles the boundary, the relationship between the electric displacement fields in the two media is established as n(D1 - D2) = σ, where σ represents the surface charge. Care must be taken with the direction of the normal vector when applying Gauss's integral theorem. Additionally, Stokes's theorem indicates that the tangential components of the electric field must remain continuous across the boundary. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing electric fields at material interfaces.
pop_ianosd
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Consider the interface between two materials with different electrical permitivities ε1 and ε2;
Let's say we know the surface charge density on this surface γ(Let's say the only charge is on the interface).
How do you apply Gauss's Law here.
Or,
How do you find the elecrtic field at a random point.(Consider the interface is simple, like a plane).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You use the electric displacement form.
 
How?

I see how it is used whith homogenous materials, but how can it be applied for a discontinuity?
I may be missing something.
 
Maxwell's equations or in your case the simplified version for the electrostatic field are only complete together with appropriate boundary conditions. The fundamental macroscopic equations read (in Heaviside-Lorentz units)
\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{D}=\rho, \quad \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0.
In linear-response approximation the constitutive equation reads
\vec{D}=\epsilon \vec{E}.
If you have a discontinuity like your problem with the two dielectrics joining at a given surface, you have to use the integral form of these laws for appropriate geometries of the volume elements, surfaces, and boundaries of these.

Let's start with the first equation. Here, since you have a divergence, you should apply a volume integral. To get the boundary conditions for the displacement \vec{D}, you integrate over an infinitesimally small cube with two of its boundary surfaces parallel to the boundary of the two media, one in the one medium and one in the other. Using Gauß's integral theorem, you then get
\vec{n} (\vec{D}_1-\vec{D}_2)=\sigma,
where \sigma is the corresponding surface charge along the boundary. You have to be careful with the signs: In the way given here, the surface normal vector \vec{n} must point from medium 2 into medium 1 according to the rule that the surface-normal vectors in Gauß's integral theorem must point out of the volume you integrate over.

Because of the curl, in the second equation you have to choose an appropriate infintitesimal rectangular area with two of it's edges parallel to the boundary of the media and two perpendicular (of course you can choose any such surface). Using Stokes's integral theorem this leads to the conclusion that all components of \vec{E} tangent to the boundary between the media must be continuous across this boundary.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top