How do you apply Gauss's Law at an interface with different permittivities?

AI Thread Summary
To apply Gauss's Law at an interface with different permittivities, one must consider the surface charge density and use the integral form of the law for appropriate geometries. By integrating over a small cube that straddles the boundary, the relationship between the electric displacement fields in the two media is established as n(D1 - D2) = σ, where σ represents the surface charge. Care must be taken with the direction of the normal vector when applying Gauss's integral theorem. Additionally, Stokes's theorem indicates that the tangential components of the electric field must remain continuous across the boundary. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing electric fields at material interfaces.
pop_ianosd
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Consider the interface between two materials with different electrical permitivities ε1 and ε2;
Let's say we know the surface charge density on this surface γ(Let's say the only charge is on the interface).
How do you apply Gauss's Law here.
Or,
How do you find the elecrtic field at a random point.(Consider the interface is simple, like a plane).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You use the electric displacement form.
 
How?

I see how it is used whith homogenous materials, but how can it be applied for a discontinuity?
I may be missing something.
 
Maxwell's equations or in your case the simplified version for the electrostatic field are only complete together with appropriate boundary conditions. The fundamental macroscopic equations read (in Heaviside-Lorentz units)
\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{D}=\rho, \quad \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0.
In linear-response approximation the constitutive equation reads
\vec{D}=\epsilon \vec{E}.
If you have a discontinuity like your problem with the two dielectrics joining at a given surface, you have to use the integral form of these laws for appropriate geometries of the volume elements, surfaces, and boundaries of these.

Let's start with the first equation. Here, since you have a divergence, you should apply a volume integral. To get the boundary conditions for the displacement \vec{D}, you integrate over an infinitesimally small cube with two of its boundary surfaces parallel to the boundary of the two media, one in the one medium and one in the other. Using Gauß's integral theorem, you then get
\vec{n} (\vec{D}_1-\vec{D}_2)=\sigma,
where \sigma is the corresponding surface charge along the boundary. You have to be careful with the signs: In the way given here, the surface normal vector \vec{n} must point from medium 2 into medium 1 according to the rule that the surface-normal vectors in Gauß's integral theorem must point out of the volume you integrate over.

Because of the curl, in the second equation you have to choose an appropriate infintitesimal rectangular area with two of it's edges parallel to the boundary of the media and two perpendicular (of course you can choose any such surface). Using Stokes's integral theorem this leads to the conclusion that all components of \vec{E} tangent to the boundary between the media must be continuous across this boundary.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Back
Top