Big Jock
- 100
- 0
I see your point now I think
The root 2 needs to trail along. It doesn't make sense to speak of a waveform having an instantaneous value of .. RMS. Whether neater or not!gneill said:The RMS conversion for a sinusoid is just a scale factor. The function of time using the RMS instead of peak for the constants will be a scaled version of the actual voltage waveform. One can always multiply results by √2 to obtain the actual voltage. It's just that the numbers are a bit easier to work with when they're nice multiples of ten![]()
NascentOxygen said:The root 2 needs to trail along. It doesn't make sense to speak of a waveform having an instantaneous value of .. RMS. Whether neater or not!
Ebies said:Can I ask, what program do you guys use to plot the graphs with?
Ebies said:For some reason i do not get the same values if i try to calculate the values of voltage for the fundamental wave, 3rd harmonic or 5th harmonic... For instance if i type 141.4sin(240pi*0.01) into my calculator i get 18.553 as an answer... When from previous posts i know it should be more... Also calculating the voltage at 20ms i get a different answer for each waveform thus giving me an overall incorrect answer... Any ideas...?
gneill said:Looks like you've got your calculator set for degrees rather than radians.
oxon88 said:iv) Given an ideal V = 100V rms, what is the percentage error at 20ms
For the 5th Harmonic don't forget to include the effect of the phase angle if you haven't done so already. i forgot!jaff90110 said:I think I got it to the shape as the post #9 as gneill suggested!
Thank you.
Hi Grinder76grinder76 said:For the 5th Harmonic don't forget to include the effect of the phase angle if you haven't done so already. i forgot!