How Do You Calculate Altitude Changes in Earth's Gravitational Field Strength?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate altitude changes in Earth's gravitational field strength, the problem involves determining the heights where gravitational strength is two-thirds and one-third of its surface value. The relevant equation is F_g = GMm/r^2, which describes gravitational force. The initial attempt at a solution indicates confusion about the correct equation and how to approach the problem. Participants in the discussion seek clarification on setting up proportions and the proper use of equations for these calculations. Understanding the relationship between gravitational strength and altitude is essential for solving these problems accurately.
Jtappan
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a) Find the altitude above the Earth's surface where Earth's gravitational field strength would be two-thirds of its value at the surface. Assume re = 6.371 103 km.
km
(b) Find the altitude above the Earth's surface where Earth's gravitational field strength would be one-third of its value at the surface.
km



Homework Equations



m = (GMe/Re^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Im not entirely sure the equation is right for this type of problem. I do not even know where to start for this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jtappan said:

Homework Statement



(a) Find the altitude above the Earth's surface where Earth's gravitational field strength would be two-thirds of its value at the surface. Assume re = 6.371 103 km.
km
(b) Find the altitude above the Earth's surface where Earth's gravitational field strength would be one-third of its value at the surface.
km

Homework Equations



m = (GMe/Re^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Im not entirely sure the equation is right for this type of problem. I do not even know where to start for this problem.
I think your equation is wrong. F_g=\frac{GMm}{r^2}

Do you know how to set up a proportion of equations?
 
Could you please explain how to do that? :-)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top