How Do You Calculate Braking Distance Based on Initial Speed and Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicswonder
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate braking distance, the appropriate kinematic equations must be used, particularly when acceleration is involved. For the first question, the equation s = ut + 1/2at^2 is suggested, as simple distance calculations (d=vt) are insufficient due to changing velocity during braking. The initial speed of 60 km/h must be converted to m/s for accurate calculations, and the final velocity at a dead stop is 0 m/s. In the second question, the initial speed changes to 90 km/h, requiring the use of the same kinematic principles. Understanding the implications of "dead stop" is crucial for determining final velocity in these calculations.
physicswonder
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. How much distance does a car cover during this period: from 60 Km/Hr, a car comes to a dead stop in 10 seconds, from the time the brake is applied (answer in m/s)
2. What will be the braking distance if the car travels at 90Km/hour (answer in m/s)

Homework Equations


s = ut + 1/2at^2
v^2 = u^2 + 2as

The Attempt at a Solution


NOTE: What equation is best used for the first question, is it distance=v*t OR one of the complicated distance equations since acceleration needs to be found. I am unsure whether you must retain 60 km/hr as initial velocity to 90 km/hr as final velocity in the 2nd question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One can't simply use d=vt in this case since the velocity is changing during the braking process.
It will be necessary to use a "complicated distance equation", however, not one of the two you listed since you don't know the acceleration yet. Most likely you have a list of four basic kinematic equations for motion with constant acceleration. Assuming you do, is there one that does not have a(for acceleration) in it?
As for the second part, it resets the initial conditions of the problem. The new initial velocity is 90 km/hr and that must be used.
 
bacon said:
One can't simply use d=vt in this case since the velocity is changing during the braking process.
It will be necessary to use a "complicated distance equation", however, not one of the two you listed since you don't know the acceleration yet. Most likely you have a list of four basic kinematic equations for motion with constant acceleration. Assuming you do, is there one that does not have a(for acceleration) in it?
As for the second part, it resets the initial conditions of the problem. The new initial velocity is 90 km/hr and that must be used.

Thanks for settling the second question but I am still unsure which equation would be best since there is no final velocity and no acceleration.
 
Take a look at this post: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=95426
Click on the link(it's titled "motion_1dim.pdf").
Scroll down to page 11, you will see four equations of motion. There is one that does not contain acceleration. See if that helps you.

"...there is no final velocity...". Reread the question and think of what "...dead stop..." means and how you would assign a value to it.

Hope this helps.
 
bacon said:
Take a look at this post: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=95426
Click on the link(it's titled "motion_1dim.pdf").
Scroll down to page 11, you will see four equations of motion. There is one that does not contain acceleration. See if that helps you.

"...there is no final velocity...". Reread the question and think of what "...dead stop..." means and how you would assign a value to it.

Hope this helps.

I think I have an idea, thanks for the reply
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top