How Do You Calculate Change in Kinetic Energy for an Elastic Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter psruler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inelastic
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the change in kinetic energy for an elastic collision, use the formula KE = 1/2mv^2. In the given scenario, a rubber ball with a mass of 0.015 kg and a velocity of 6.26 m/s has the same speed before and after bouncing off the floor. The change in kinetic energy is determined by subtracting the kinetic energy before the collision from the kinetic energy after, resulting in 0 joules. This outcome is expected because, in elastic collisions, kinetic energy is conserved, meaning there is no change in energy. Therefore, the change in kinetic energy for the rubber ball in this case is zero.
psruler
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi!

How do i find change in kinetic energy?

Here is the problem:
The rubber ball is dropped 2m elastically off the floor, so its speed immediately after bouncing is the same as immediately b4.
If the rubber ball has a mass of 0.015kg and its velocity is 6.26m/s, what is its change in kinetic energy from immediately b4 the collision to immediately after the collision? Breifly justify your answer.

Do i use this equation, KE = 1/2mv^2?

THANKS!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup. Change in kinetic energy is just the kinetic energy after minus the kinetic energy before.

So KE = 1/2*mv^2, now if m is the same for both and v is the same for both...

cookiemonster
 
So is my answer, 0.29N?
 
Hold on now!

1/2(.015kg)(6.26m/s)^2 - 1/2(.015)(6.26m/s)^2 = ?

Also, what units do you get? Here's a hint: it's not Newtons! It's kinetic energy, so its units will probably be energy.

cookiemonster
 
I got 0 joules.
 
Yup. And this makes sense, too, since this collision is elastic. Elastic collisions are collisions in which energy is conserved, so energy before had better equal energy after (and their difference had better equal zero)!

cookiemonster
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top