How Do You Calculate Error in Complex Physics Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Exulus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Error
AI Thread Summary
Calculating errors in complex physics equations involves finding the partial derivatives of each variable, multiplying by their respective errors, squaring the results, summing them, and taking the square root of the total. The equation in question includes variables R, B, and theta, each associated with errors. One participant struggled initially but found clarity by treating non-differentiated variables as constants, which simplified the process. This approach aligns with standard practices in partial differentiation and applying the chain rule. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of breaking down complex expressions to manage error calculations effectively.
Exulus
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I really struggle with calculating errors :( I understand what i have to do, find the partial derivative of each variable and multiply it by the error, square it, add up all the others then square root the total. I just seem totally incapable of doing it :( The expression i have to find error on is:

E = m_{0}c^2 [\sqrt{1+(\frac{RqB}{m_{0}c\tan{\frac{\Theta}{2}}}) ^2} - 1]

Where R, B and theta all have errors associated with them! (to find the error on E)

I've been told its possible to break it down one bit at a time, so evalulating the RqB bit i get:

\sigma = \sqrt{ (B\Delta R)^2 + (R\Delta B)^2}

But no idea where to go next :( Any help much appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So are you having trouble with finding the partial derivatives in the uncertainty expression below??
\sigma=\sqrt{(\frac{\delta E}{\delta R})^2*(\Delta R)^2+(\frac{\delta E}{\delta B})^2*(\Delta B)^2+(\frac{\delta E}{\delta\theta})^2*(\Delta\theta)^2}
 
Last edited:
Hi,

Yeah i was having trouble with it. I think I've solved it now. I went an incredibly long way around it by calling everything else inside the bracket which wasnt the variable to be differentiated, a constant, such as C. That made me see what was going on a bit better and i think it worked! *fingers crossed* i can't change it now as the work has been handed in :) Thanks though!
 
yeah well that's all you do in partial differentiation anyway. You treat everything else as a constant except the variable you are differentiatin with respect to. Then in your case you had to apply the chain rule and bob's your uncle ;)
Good luck with it then and it sounds like you had the right idea so it should be ok.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top