How Do You Calculate Flavor-Spin Wavefunctions in Quantum Chromodynamics?

Hepth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
457
Reaction score
40
I'm having a little trouble recreating some things from a paper and it is due to my lack of knowledge of working with Flavor-Spin wavefunctions.
I'm trying to show that :
<br /> \left\langle \Lambda \left|b_s^{\dagger }b_b\right|\Lambda _b\right\rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}<br />
and
<br /> \left\langle p \left|b_u^{\dagger }b_c\right|\Lambda _c^+\right\rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<br />

These two papers both take their operation from the same text, but none of it explicitly shows how they get it or what wavefunctions they use. I assume this is because it is ELEMENTARY but while searching around, many books/articles give different wavefunctions using different approaches.

I'm wondering where I should start. I feel like this should be a simple multiplication but everytime I try it I don't get their answers.

From you guys, do any of you know offhand know the flavor-spin states for a lambda and p (both in s=1/2)? One paper gives both octet proton flavor wavefunctions as :
p&#039;=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\text{udu}-\text{duu})
p\text{&#039;&#039;}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}(2\text{uud}-\text{duu}-\text{udu})

Which is right? Or is it that only in a linear combination with some spin states to make the total flavor-spin function symmetric :
\left.|56,S=\frac{1}{2},8\right\rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(p&#039;\chi &#039;+p\text{&#039;&#039;}\chi \text{&#039;&#039;})

where the spinors are pretty much the same as the protons function but with spin arrows up and down instead of "u u d".

Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, if I get something like:

u^{\dagger } u^{\dagger } d^{\dagger } u c^{\dagger } d u c

and I believe its the trace of this (since i summed over spin states?)
Is there a way to simplify? I know I can cyclically permutate traces to simplify, but that doesn't help this one.
Since I'm summing over spin, and this is merely the flavor representation, can I interchange any two operators freely? Or it would add the (-1) because its not symmetric as just the flavor representation in s=1/2?

If that's the case, then this would simplify to:
- u^{\dagger} u u^{\dagger} u d^{\dagger} d c^{\dagger} c

Which is just -1?

If I follow that method, I get something that isn't what they have. Or am I way off?
 
Ok, so no responses. Let me clean up my questions then.

From Appendix A (Page 25&26) of http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/9304/9304286v1.pdf

I have, in their choice of wavefunctions for a proton and a lambda_c:

p=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\left[u u d \chi _s +(13)+(23)\right]
\Lambda _c^+=\frac{-1}{\sqrt{6}}\left[(u d c- d u c) \chi _A +(13)+(23)\right]
\chi _s=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\left[a^{\uparrow } b^{\uparrow } c^{\downarrow }-a^{\uparrow } b^{\downarrow } c^{\uparrow }-a^{\downarrow } b^{\uparrow } c^{\uparrow }\right]
\chi _A=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left[a^{\uparrow } b^{\downarrow } c^{\uparrow }-a^{\downarrow } b^{\uparrow } c^{\uparrow }\right]

Where (13) is just the permutation.

I'm trying to show that:N_{\text{fi}}=\, _{\text{flavor} \text{spin}}\left\langle \Lambda \left|b_s^{\dagger }b_c\right|\Lambda _c^+\right\rangle {}_{\text{flavor} \text{spin}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} (in http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/9502/9502391v3.pdf, bottom of page 13, same author)

and
N_{\text{fi}}=\, _{\text{flavor} \text{spin}}\left\langle p\left|b_u^{\dagger }b_c\right|\Lambda _c^+\right\rangle {}_{\text{flavor} \text{spin}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (page 18, same article)I've tried working it out by hand, I don't htink I'm doing it right because I keep getting 3/Sqrt[6] for the proton one, and I get 1 for the lambda_c to lambda.

I know I shouldn't get one, I think I'm doing the operator wrong.

What would I do for the 2 quark flavor spin operator here? Does it replace all c's with u's? Or does it affect spin in any way? Etc. I know its killing off the c, and creating a u, but how does that individually affect "u c d" parts of the wavefunction?

Please help guide me, I just can't seem to do it correctly. ANY help will be amazing.

-hepth
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top