How Do You Calculate Forces and Sums with Uncertainties?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating forces and sums with uncertainties, particularly in the context of physics problems involving mass and acceleration. Participants explore how to express results when uncertainties are present, including methods for addition, subtraction, and multiplication of values with associated errors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest calculating force using the lower and upper error bar values of mass, as well as the midpoint value, to express the final result with uncertainty.
  • There is a discussion about whether to consider the uncertainty of additional values (e.g., 6.2 kg) as negligible when performing addition with uncertain values.
  • One participant mentions that if errors are independent, the uncertainties should be combined using the square root of the sum of the squares method.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between direct measurement errors and statistical sample errors, noting that the treatment of uncertainties can vary based on the context.
  • A participant proposes a formula for combining mass and uncertainty when multiplying by acceleration, suggesting that the uncertainty should also be scaled accordingly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to handle uncertainties in calculations, particularly regarding the treatment of additional values and the methods for combining uncertainties. There is no consensus on a single approach, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the treatment of uncertainties may depend on whether they are derived from direct measurements or statistical calculations, which introduces additional complexity to the discussion.

jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
My textbook isn't very clear on this. Let's say i find the mass of an object to be 24.5kg +-.2kg. Then i want to use that answer to calculate F (F=ma) when acceleration is equal to -9.81m/s2. What would the final answer look like. Also what about addition and subtraction. For sake of simplicity, (24.5kg +-.2kg) + (6.2kg)=?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lundyjb said:
My textbook isn't very clear on this. Let's say i find the mass of an object to be 24.5kg +-.2kg. Then i want to use that answer to calculate F (F=ma) when acceleration is equal to -9.81m/s2. What would the final answer look like. Also what about addition and subtraction. For sake of simplicity, (24.5kg +-.2kg) + (6.2kg)=?

Thanks

For the first question you could calculate the force for each of the lower and upper error bar values (24.3 and 24.7 kg) and the midpoint value assuming the midpoint is your "best" or expected value. For the second question, are you assuming the error is negligible for the 6.2 value? If so you can simply add it to the first midpoint value and bring the error bars down to your sum. If the errors were non zero standard deviations you would generally square the errors, add them and then take the square root of the sum if the errors are independent.

If you're calculating a mean, then the individual observations would not have error bars. The standard error or standard deviation of the mean (they are not the same) of the sample would be calculated in the usual way.

EDIT: I think the reason your textbook is vague on this is because it depends on whether the errors are measured directly from some target value, or if they are calculated from a sample using statistical methods. In direct measurement of a contingent process, the errors are additive. In statistical samples the "error" is simply a measure of the variation in a sample around a mean or average value and uses some version of the mean squared error.
 
Last edited:
If you only have one value that has any uncertainty, it's easy. If you are combining uncertainties, it's a little more difficult, and it depends on whether the uncertainties are independent. In your example, you only have one uncertain value, so if you multiply the value, you should multiply the uncertainty as well. Use your intuition here; I'd be surprised if that gave you the wrong answer.
 
Khashishi said:
In your example, you only have one uncertain value, so if you multiply the value, you should multiply the uncertainty as well. Use your intuition here; I'd be surprised if that gave you the wrong answer.

I'm not sure what you mean by "multiply the uncertainty". In the OPs example, there are error bars around the kg value. I suggested that he use the lower and upper limit values of the interval to calculate the interval for force. This is not multiplication of the uncertainty ( plus or minus 0.2kg).
 
Last edited:
what I mean is a*(m +- e) = am +- ae
-9.81m/s^2 * (24.5kg +- 0.2kg) = -240.345N +- 1.962N
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K