How Do You Calculate Microstates for a Constrained Spin System?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of microstates for two systems of spin 1/2 paramagnets, constrained by a total of 6 spins pointing up. A table was created showing the combinations of spins pointing up in each system and the corresponding number of accessible microstates calculated using binomial coefficients. The calculations confirmed that the total number of accessible microstates for the combined system is 3003. The method used for determining the microstates was validated as correct. Overall, the approach and calculations were accurate and effectively demonstrated the concept.
Nylex
Messages
552
Reaction score
2
Consider 2 systems of spin 1/2 paramagnets, which may point either up or down wrt a magnetic field. The first system contains 8 paramagnets and the second contains 6 paramagnets.

Suppose the energy of the combined system is constrained such that the total number of spins pointing up in the 2 systems is forced to be 6. Make a table of the possible values of n (no. of paramagnets pointing up, in 1st system) and m (no. of paramagnets pointing up, in 2nd system) and the number of microstates of the combined system for each case. By summing the entries of your table, obtain the total number of accessible microstates subject to the energy constraints.

This is what I've done so far:

m | n | accessible microstates
6 | 0 | (6C6) x (8C0) = 1
5 | 1 | (6C5) x (8C1) = 48
4 | 2 | (6C4) x (8C2) = 420
3 | 3 | (6C3) x (8C3) = 1120
2 | 4 | (6C2) x (8C4) = 1050
1 | 5 | (6C1) x (8C5) = 336
0 | 6 | (6C0) x (8C6) = 28

Total no. of accessible microstates = 3003.

I'm not sure whether or not my method for working out the no. of accessible microstates is right.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone check it for me?

Your method for calculating the number of accessible microstates is correct. The formula for calculating the number of microstates for a given system is given by the binomial coefficient, which you have correctly used in your table. The total number of accessible microstates for the combined system is obtained by summing the entries in your table, which gives the correct answer of 3003. Good job!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top