How Do You Calculate Molar Mass from BCC Packing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vipertongn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the molar mass of an element with body-centered cubic (bcc) packing, the density (862 kg/m^3) and unit cell volume (1.51 x 10^-28 m^3) are used. The correct molar mass is determined to be 39.2 g/mol. The calculation involves converting density to grams and using Avogadro's number, but confusion arose regarding the packing density factor. The participant initially miscalculated the value, leading to an incorrect result. Understanding the unit conversions and the relevance of packing density is crucial for accurate calculations.
vipertongn
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An element has bcc packing with a body-centered cubic unit cell. Its density is 862 kg/m^3 and the unit cell volume is 1.51 x 10-28 m^3. Calculate the molar mass (g/mol) of the element to three significant figures.

Homework Equations



Known: D= 862 kg/m^3, V=1.51 x 10-28 m^3 , MM=??

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok the correct answer is 39.2, but I don't know how to arrive to that answer.

(862kg/m^3)(1.51e-28m^3)(1000g/1kg)(6.022e23atoms/1mol)(1/2 atoms)
(0.68) but instead I get 26.6504.

The 0.68 is the density packing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vipertongn said:
The 0.68 is the density packing.

Are you sure it is relevant to the question?
 
ah, htat wasn't required, thanks
 
The real question is: do you understand what you did and why?
 
Yes, I pretty much converted to the proper units I needed, the only problem was getting the right units.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top