How Do You Calculate Object-to-Image Distance in Lens Systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aelo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the object-to-image distance for a 50 mm focal length thin lens imaging a 250 mm x 250 mm object onto a 10 mm x 10 mm detector, the relevant equations include the thin lens formula and the throw equation. The lateral magnification (M) is determined to be 0.04, calculated from the dimensions of the object and image. The relationship between object distance (l) and image distance (l') can be established using M, leading to the formula l = F*(1 - M)/M. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the signs of distances and magnification when applying these formulas. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately determining the overall object-to-image distance.
Aelo
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 50 mm focal length thin lens in air is used to image a 250 mm x 250 mm object onto a 10 mm x 10 mm detector. What is the overall object-to-image distance (throw)? Besides the exact solution, can you think of a reasonable approximation?


Homework Equations


Throw, T = l' - l
For a thin lens: (1/l') = (1/F) + (1/l)
For a thin lens in air: f = -F

The Attempt at a Solution



Since f = 50 mm was given, F = -50 mm. I'm thinking that if I could find either l' or l, I could then use the second equation to find the remaining unknown, and then plug into the equation for T. I'm not sure how to use the given dimensions for the object and detector. I know of no equations that incorporate the area, and I can't determine what else they could be used to describe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aelo said:

Homework Statement


A 50 mm focal length thin lens in air is used to image a 250 mm x 250 mm object onto a 10 mm x 10 mm detector. What is the overall object-to-image distance (throw)? Besides the exact solution, can you think of a reasonable approximation?


Homework Equations


Throw, T = l' - l
For a thin lens: (1/l') = (1/F) + (1/l)
For a thin lens in air: f = -F

The Attempt at a Solution



Since f = 50 mm was given, F = -50 mm. I'm thinking that if I could find either l' or l, I could then use the second equation to find the remaining unknown, and then plug into the equation for T. I'm not sure how to use the given dimensions for the object and detector. I know of no equations that incorporate the area, and I can't determine what else they could be used to describe.

You get the magnification from the given sizes of object and image. The image is on the detector, so it is real. How are l and l' related ?

ehild
 
M = l' / l

Is it correct to think that the lateral magnification is the ratio between the horizontal length of the image and that of the object? If so, then M = 10 mm / 250 mm = .04

l' = l*M so 1/F = 1/(l*M) - 1/l = 1/(l*M) - M/(l*M) = (1 - M)/(l*M)
=> l = F*(1 - M)/M
 
Aelo said:
M = l' / l

Is it correct to think that the lateral magnification is the ratio between the horizontal length of the image and that of the object? If so, then M = 10 mm / 250 mm = .04

take care of the sign of M.

ehild
 
Why would either 10 mm or 250 mm be negative? I understand l would be negative since it is measured from the lens to the object, so I agree that M should be negative, but I didn't think the dimensions of the object and image were given relative to anything. Is taking the ratio between horizontal lengths "one of those" formulas where I calculate the magnitude and have to come up with the sign independently?
 
We take the real image inverted, so its height negative.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh, it's the ratio of heights, not widths. Thank you very much for your help. :)
 
Aelo said:
Oh, it's the ratio of heights, not widths. Thank you very much for your help. :)

You are welcome. :smile:

ehild
 

Similar threads

Back
Top