How Do You Calculate the Center of Mass of a Nonuniform Bar Suspended by Wires?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PSEYE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wires
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the center of mass of a nonuniform bar suspended by wires, the forces acting on the bar must be analyzed, specifically the tensions in the wires and the weight of the bar. The equilibrium conditions require that the vertical components of the forces balance out, leading to the equation -F₁ · sin(φ₁) + F₂ · sin(φ₂) = 0. The position of the center of mass can be expressed as x = L / ((F₁/F₂)·(cos(φ₁)/cos(φ₂)) + 1), but confusion arises from mixing sine and cosine components. A suggestion is made to take moments about a point to eliminate unknown forces, which may provide a clearer solution. Correctly applying these principles will yield the accurate position of the center of mass.
PSEYE
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A nonuniform horizontal bar of mass m is supported by two massless wires against gravity. The left wire makes an angle (phi) with the horizontal, and the right wire makes an angle . The bar has length L.

What is the position of the center of mass of the bar, measured as distance from the bar's left end?

x=?

Homework Equations



-F₁ · sin(φ₁) + F₂ · sin(φ₂) = 0
___________________________________
F₁x = -F₁ · sin(φ₁)
F₁y = F₁ · cos(φ₁)
F₂x = F₂ · sin(φ₂)
F₂y = F₂ · cos(φ₂)


forces in terms of magnitude and angle
x = L / ( (F₁/F₂)·(cos(φ₁)/cos(φ₂)) + 1)


The Attempt at a Solution




x = L / ( (tan(φ₂)/tan(φ₁) + 1)

this seems right, but I'm repeatedly getting it wrong no matter how I input the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
take moments …

PSEYE said:
x = L / ( (tan(φ₂)/tan(φ₁) + 1)

Hi PSEYE! :smile:

Sorry, but I've no idea how you got that result. :confused:

You have three unknown forces, F1 F2 and W, which you don't want in the final equation.

The only ways I know to eliminate unknown forces are:

i] take components perpendicular to them … which isn't going to work in this case … or

ii] take moments about a point through their line of action.

Try ii]! :smile:
 
PSEYE said:
-F₁ · sin(φ₁) + F₂ · sin(φ₂) = 0
___________________________________
F₁x = -F₁ · sin(φ₁)
F₁y = F₁ · cos(φ₁)
F₂x = F₂ · sin(φ₂)
F₂y = F₂ · cos(φ₂)
If phi_1 and phi_2 are the angles with the horizontal, you've got your sines and cosines mixed up.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top