How Do You Calculate the Combined Phase Angle Shift of Multiple Waves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter armolinasf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Phasor
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the combined phase angle shift of multiple waves, one can treat the amplitude and phase angle as polar coordinates and convert them into Cartesian coordinates (x, y). For the given waves, the first step involves adding the x and y components of each wave separately. After obtaining the resultant vector, the combined phase angle can be determined using the arctan function. The initial approach of adding waves sequentially may lead to incorrect phase angle results, so vector addition is recommended for accuracy. This method effectively simplifies the calculation of the combined phase angle shift for multiple waves.
armolinasf
Messages
195
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If I have three different waves each with difference amplitude and phase angle how would i find the combined phase angle shift?

wave 1: A=5 phi=0
wave 2: A=5 phi=pi/4
wave 3: A=9 phi=pi/2

Homework Equations



phi'=arctan(a2sin(phi)/(a1+a2cos(phi)), where phi in this case is the difference between the phase angles of two waves.

The Attempt at a Solution



My first strategy was to add wave 1 and 2 and then add their sum to wave three. this gave me the correct combined amplitude of 15.29. I then applied the same thinking to the phase angles but the answer i got was incorrect so i tried vector addition and using the law of cosines and I got a nonsensical answer - arcos(-1.41). Needless to say i need a nudge in the right direction. Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the (A,Φ) values as polar coordinates of vectors. Convert them to (x,y) coordinates, and then it's standard vector addition from there.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top