How Do You Calculate the Focal Length of a Planar Convex Lens?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the focal length of a planar convex lens, the relevant equation is 1/f = (n/n_M - 1)(1/r_1 + 1/r_2), where n is the lens material's refractive index (1.491), n_M is the refractive index of the medium (1), r_1 is the radius of curvature (50 cm), and r_2 is considered infinite for a planar surface. The focal length is determined by the distance from the lens's curved surface to the focal point, which is valid for rays close to the optical axis, known as paraxial rays. This assumption simplifies the calculations and ensures accuracy in using the formula. Proper sign conventions for r_1, r_2, and f must be applied for correct results. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurate focal length calculations in optics.
Icheb
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Light is falling on the planar side of a thin planar convex glass lens. The curvature radius |r| is 50cm. I have to calculate the distance of the focal point to the curved surface of the lens, which to my understanding is the focal length, since it's a thin lens. Additionally I am supposed to only look at rays that are close to the axis, and I'm not sure what exactly that means.

From my understanding the only equation I need is \frac{1}{f} = (\frac{n}{n_M} - 1) (\frac{1}{r_1} + \frac{1}{r_2}). n would be 1,491, n_M would be 1, r_1 would be 50cm and r_2 would be infinitely big (since the lens is planar convex).

Would that be sufficient to solve it? If so, what does it mean that I'm only supposed to look at rays that are close to the axis? What does that change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you study the derivation of the formula for ##\frac{1}{f}##, you'll see that the derivation assumes that the rays are close to the axis ("paraxial rays"). So, the formula is generally valid only for paraxial rays.

When using the formula, you need to be sure to use the sign conventions for ##r_1##, ##r_2##, and ##f## that are associated with the formula.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top