How Do You Calculate the Frequency of Green Light from Its Wavelength?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edin_Dzeko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scientific
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the frequency of green light with a wavelength of 515 nm, the formula V = C/λ is used, where C is the speed of light. The correct frequency is found to be 5.83 x 10^14 s^-1. There was confusion regarding dimensional analysis and the treatment of exponents during calculations. The discussion also touched on the distinction between scientific theories and facts, emphasizing that scientific terminology can differ from everyday language. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate calculations and discussions in physics and chemistry.
Edin_Dzeko
Messages
204
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A laser used to dazzle the audience in a rock concert emits green light with a wave length of 515 nm. Calculate the frequency of the light.


Homework Equations



V = C/Lambdah

The Attempt at a Solution


http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/7982/unledpg.jpg

** In the image I forgot to knock off the "nm" after I did the dimensional analysis to convert it to m disregard it***

My answer when I put it in my calculator is what's in the image but the book has the correct answer as: 5.83 x 10^14 s

How did they get 10x^14? If the bases aren't the same what happens to the exponents?

There was another problem which was solved by the book itself:

3.00 x 10^8 m/(s/s) - **(means s cancels out)
---------------------------
4.62 x 10^14 /(s/s) - ** (means s cancels out)

= 6.49 x 10^-7 m (how did they get -7?)!


Btw, I'm doing the wavelength and frequency equation in Chemistry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When you put it into your calculator, you did {{3x10^8}\over{515}}*10^-9 to get that answer. Make sure you enclose the 10^-9 part in the denominator with parenthesis.
 
correct and I love your tagline pengwuino amazingly some physicists I know that don't believe in evolution...truly I fear for my country and the world...
 
zaldar said:
correct and I love your tagline pengwuino amazingly some physicists I know that don't believe in evolution...truly I fear for my country and the world...

Thanks. Someone else on the forum actually said it and I stole it from him to use as a signature.

Unfortunately, a couple people have said "Oh so you think evolution is fake huh!".
 
good lord...people here? Do they not understand science...? Theory in science means FACT. RAGE! Sigh...I mean theory of gravity anyone?
 
zaldar said:
good lord...people here? Do they not understand science...? Theory in science means FACT. RAGE! Sigh...I mean theory of gravity anyone?

Hmm careful, no it doesn't. In scientific context, "facts" are few and far between. A theory in science really has its own meaning that is not exactly like "fact" and far from the lay term "theory".
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top