How Do You Calculate the Moment of Inertia for a Disk Rotated Off-Center?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia for a disk rotated off-center, one must consider the axis of rotation's position relative to the disk's mass distribution. The moment of inertia is not affected by the orientation of the disk; it is a scalar quantity that depends solely on mass and distance from the axis. The parallel axis theorem can be applied to find the moment of inertia about the new axis by adding the product of the mass and the square of the distance from the center of mass to the new axis. Subtracting the moment of inertia of the section above the axis from that below is not a valid approach, as it does not yield a meaningful physical result. Understanding these principles will clarify the calculation process for the moment of inertia in this scenario.
Sweeney91
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I just got of a test that had a question about moment of inertia on it. The question "Calculate the moment of inertia of a thin uniformed disk that is being rotated about an axis of rotation". This axis is halfway between the center of the disk and the outer perimeter. The mass of the disk is M and the radius of the disk is R. The question that came to me while taking the test was "is because a quarter of the disk is above the axis of rotation and the rest of the circle is below it do you subtract the moment of inertia of the little part (part above axis of rotation) away from the moment of inertia of the big part (part below axis of rotation). The question above isn't worded exactly as is was on the test, but I worded it in a way I felt easies to understand. I'm not trying to cheat or anything, I just want to know my theory was correct or not. I asked a few fellow students and none of them could give me a definitive answer. I googled almost everything, but I couldn't fine an example similar to this. I feel this is the best way to get the answer that I am seeking. If possible please answer the question above, and then let me know if I was on the right track.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does "above" and "below" mean in this context? Coordinate axes are arbitrary. What if you turned the diagram upside down? Would you then subtract the larger portion from the smaller and get a negative moment of inertia? How about if you turned it sideways? Would it make sense for orientation to affect the result?

You could try doing the math for your idea to see if the result matches what the known answer is. Do you know how to apply the parallel axis theorem?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top