How Do You Calculate the Moment of Inertia for a Rotating Slab?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia for a thin rectangular slab rotated about an axis parallel to its short edge, the parallel axis theorem is applied. The correct formula is Ip = Icm + Mh^2, where Icm is the moment of inertia about the center of mass, and h is the distance from the center of mass to the new axis. The moment of inertia for the slab is Icm = (1/12)M(L^2), with L being the longer dimension of the slab. The distance h must be accurately calculated as half the longer dimension minus the distance from the edge to the new axis. The final calculated moment of inertia is approximately 0.013745 kg m^2, and rounding errors can affect the final answer in homework submissions.
sheepcountme
Messages
80
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A thin rectangular slab, with dimensions 0.580 m by 0.830 m and mass 0.150 kg, is rotated about an axis passing through the slab parallel to the short edge. If the axis is 0.230 m from the short edge, what is the moment of inertia of the slab?


Homework Equations



Ip=Icm+mh^2

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I used the formula for inertia of a slap (I=1/12 x m x L^2) and plugged this in for Icm above:
Ip=1/12 x M (L^2) + M x h^2
Ip=1/12 (.150)(.83^2)+.150(.230^2)
Ip=.008611+.007935
Ip=.0165

But this wasn't correct, could you tell me where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For problems like this I always find it useful to draw a sketch of my object along with the axes I'm taking moments of inertia around.

Having done that, I think your error is that in applying Ip=Icm+mh^2 (parallel axis theorem) you've taken H to be 0.230 - which is incorrect, since H is the distance from the centre of mass to your new axis, yet 0.230 in this case is the distance from the edge of your slab to your axis.

So you should use H = 0.185 (which is 0.830/2 - 0.230).

EDIT: Oops. I said L, but I meant H, sorry.
 
Last edited:
Also you used the moment of inertia of a rod.

You need to use the moment of inertia of a rectangular lamina which is

I_c = \frac{1}{12}M(a^2+b^2)
 
Our book explains that I=1/12 M L^2 is also used for a slab with the axis through the center parallel to the edge. Isn't I=1/12 M (a^2 + b^2) used if the axis is through the center?
 
sheepcountme said:
Our book explains that I=1/12 M L^2 is also used for a slab with the axis through the center parallel to the edge. Isn't I=1/12 M (a^2 + b^2) used if the axis is through the center?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia

Rod = \frac{1}{12}ML^2

Rectangular Plate = \frac{1}{12}M(a^2+b^2)
 
I'm just telling you what our book says:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/aliceinunderwear/Picture1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm afraid using the L as above, and also trying to use the I=1/12 x M (a^2+b^2) were also wrong according to the book.
 
As you said, I=1/12 M L^2 is for a slab with the axis passing through the center. In this problem the axis doesn't pass through the center.
 
Yes, so I used the parallel axis theorem: Ip=Icm + Mh^2
Was this incorrect?
 
  • #10
rock.freak667 said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia

Rod = \frac{1}{12}ML^2

Rectangular Plate = \frac{1}{12}M(a^2+b^2)

The axis is through the centre (at least until we shift it using the parallel axis theorem), but parallel to the short edge, so the moment of inertia will actually be:

I_{cm}=\frac{1}{12}ML^2

It's easy enough to verify this from first principles (which is normally a good idea when you're unsure if an equation is valid in a certain context) by using the definition of the moment of inertia as an integral.

Then using the parallel axis theorem and substituting:

I_{p}=\frac{1}{12}ML^2 + MH^2

Which is the moment of inertia that you want - but of course you already figured that out. Note that here, L is 0.830m and H is the distance from the edge to the new axis (should be 0.830/2 - 0.230, just by geometry).

If it's still 'wrong', then perhaps the answer in your book is misprinted? I got:

I_{p}= 0.013745 kg m^2

Is that the answer in your book?
 
  • #11
I misread the parallel to the edge part.
 
  • #12
Jmf - yes! Thank you so much! As it turns out I actually had it right one of the many times I calculated it but I rounded too early and our HW is online and is SO tempermental about how one enters things!
 
Back
Top