How Do You Calculate the Normalized Frequency for a Multimode Fiber?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the normalized frequency (V) for a multimode fiber using the formula V=(2π/λ)⋅a⋅√(n1²-n2²). The user encounters a discrepancy in their result, calculating V as 167 instead of the expected 84, which leads to confusion about the accuracy of the formula or the provided values. Another participant points out that their own calculation yields 168.57, suggesting a potential factor of 2 discrepancy. The conversation highlights the challenges of verifying answers from exam problems where only the formula and final result are provided. Overall, the participants express uncertainty about the correct values and the calculation process.
Bananen
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm having trouble calculating the normalized frequency for a multimode fiber. Here's the formula:

V=(2π/λ)⋅a⋅√(n12-n22)

where λ=900 nm, a=200μm, n1=1.460, n2=1.455

Here's how I plug in the numbers:

V=(2π/(900*10-9))⋅(200*10-6)⋅√(1.4602-1.4552)=167This is an easy calculation I know that, but I get the wrong answer. It's supposed to be 84 but I get 167 which is obviously far away from the real answer. I don't understand what I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the answer is 168.57... , so either the formula, the numbers or the supposed result are wrong. Since 84=168/2, it should be a matter of a factor of 2.
 
On my first attempt at calculating V I also get what you did. So that leads me to ask how you know it's supposed to be 84.
 
Thank you, yes something must be wrong. It's very strange! But thank you for your answer.
 
Pixel: I'm doing old exams in preparation for my own so I calculate exam problems and checking my answers by looking at the solutions. They don't write the numbers out just the formula and then the answer so it's not very helpful
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top