How Do You Calculate Vehicle Speeds After a Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mandos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Vehicle
AI Thread Summary
To calculate vehicle speeds after a collision, the discussion focuses on a head-on collision between two vehicles with known mass and one known speed. The first question involves determining the combined speed of the vehicles immediately after impact, with a proposed answer of 4.6 m/s, but the method using kinetic energy is deemed inappropriate since kinetic energy is not conserved in inelastic collisions. The second question seeks to find the speed of vehicle B before impact, with the answer being 16 m/s. Participants emphasize the need for a different approach, as the information provided is insufficient for a complete solution. The conversation highlights the complexities of collision physics and the importance of using appropriate formulas.
mandos
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The diagram below shows a skethc drawn by an accident investigator following a head-on collision between two vehicles.

Direction of Travel A (speed 12.5 m/s) and 2400kg -------------> <---------------- Direction of Travel of B, 3600kg, unknown velocity.Final Position of vehicles:

The diagram shows two boxes, repsenting the vehicles, attached together. One box is A, and is 2400 kg. The second is 3600 kg. Also, is X (where the vehicles collided) and an arrow to the left with 8.4m, which is the distance the vehicles travelled.

The Question: Determine the speed of the interlocked vehicles immediately after impact.

The second question: Vehicle A was known to be moving at 12.5m/s just before the impact. Calculate the speed of vehicle B just before impact.

Homework Equations



Right, for the first question I assume the equation Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mv^2 is relevant. The answer is a combined speed of 4.6 m/s but unfortunately, there is little point in me knowing the answer unless I can figure out how to get there.

For the second question, I am clueless what sort of equation would be used. However, I know the answer is 16 m/s.

The Attempt at a Solution



For the first question, I tried to do Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mv^2 = 1/2 mv^2 to say that the total energy when the two vehicles collide is the same and rearrange it to find the second velocity. But in retrospect, that seems to be going down the wrong avenue?

Other than that, I can't figure out what else to use or try.

I'd appreciate anyone who can shed some insight or help. If you don't understand the question, I'll elaborate as best I can.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mandos said:
For the first question, I tried to do Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mv^2 = 1/2 mv^2 to say that the total energy when the two vehicles collide is the same and rearrange it to find the second velocity. But in retrospect, that seems to be going down the wrong avenue?

Hi mandos! :smile:

Yes, this is a totally inelastic collision, so KE isn't conserved.

What is the whole question? :confused:

There isn't enough information to solve this.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top