How Do You Convert French Decimal Time to Standard Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfsbird
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
French decimal time, used briefly after the French Revolution, divided time into ten-day weeks, ten-hour days, and hundred-minute hours. To convert French decimal time to standard time, one must establish equivalencies, such as 1 week equating to 10 days. This approach allows for the calculation of ratios between the two systems, specifically for weeks and seconds. The discussion highlights the importance of rewriting the problem using these equivalencies to simplify the conversion process. Understanding that 1 day remains constant across both systems aids in solving the conversion.
jfsbird
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am a first year University Physics student and a longgg time out of high school. I am strong in math, but I am feeling very shaky about this physics course. our first homework assignment had a couple of problems that I found a little confusing. Here is trhe first one:

For about ten years after the French Revolution the French government attempted to base measurements of time on multiples of ten: one week consisted of ten days, one day ten hours, one hour 100 minutes, and one minute 100 seconds. What are the ratios of (a) the French decimal week and the standard week, and (b) the French decimal second and the standard second?

I just need a little help getting started. Doesnt there need to be some kind of equivillancy to find a conversion factor? The answer for this problem is in the back of the book but i can't see how to get there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, hey! Are you using Halliday? Do you not love how the authors go on rants about how necessary the metric system is (see problem 30)? Fun and humor!

OK, to business. They do give you the equivilancies. Rewrite the question "1 week consisted of 10 days" as "1 week = 10 days" or more useful yet, 1=\frac{1 week}{10 days}=\frac{10 days}{1 week}. Do so for all information they give you. Does that help?
 
Last edited:
Thanks. that helps a bit. I got the part (a). And yes we're using the Halliday book. And yes he does tend to rant...
 
It took me a while and i feel like a dunce...the assumption is that 1 day = 1 day...once i saw that the rest was easy thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top