How Do You Convert Minutes to Years and Analyze Speed Comparisons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bombsaway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
To convert 0.35 minutes to years, perform dimensional analysis by sequentially converting minutes to hours, hours to days, days to months, and finally months to years, ensuring all units are canceled appropriately. For the skateboarding question, a speed of 14.7 m/s converts to 52.92 km/h, which exceeds the 30 km/h limit, indicating the skateboarder would receive a ticket. The snail, moving at 3 km/h, is 100 times slower than a normal human walk, making it approximately 17.64 times slower than the skateboarder. The key to these conversions lies in systematic unit cancellation and understanding speed comparisons. Proper dimensional analysis is essential for accurate conversions and comparisons in physics problems.
bombsaway
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



15. Convert the following times. All units must be shown as well as cancellations.

f) 0.35 minutes to years.

19. a) The maximum speed reached by a standing skate boarder is about 14.7 m/s. Would the skate boarder get a ticket in a 30 km/h speed zone?

b) A snail crawls 100 times slower than a normal human walk (3km/h). How many times slower than the skate boarder is the snail?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did not really state where your stuck...which it makes it a bit hard to help you.

But here is a try for the first q

"Convert the following times. All units must be shown as well as cancellations.

f) 0.35 minutes to years"


This is a dimensional analysis type q. Used commonly in chemistry and higher classes physics.

for example, 50 mL to L

50mL x 1L/1000mL

as you can see we converted over a unit we want and canceled the units we do not want. Your question follows a similar path...just keep converting until you get to years ex. mins to hours to days to months to finally years.


The other questions follow a similar method.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top