How Do You Correctly Convert Complex Numbers to Mod-Arg Form?

Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
When given a complex number z=x+iy and transforming this into its mod-arg form giving rcis\theta where r=\sqrt{(x^2+y^2)} and \theta=arctan(y/x), we are assuming that -\pi/2<\theta<\pi/2.

What if however a student is asked to convert the complex number -1-i into mod-arg form? If they just start to plug-and-chug they'll quickly end up with the result \theta=\pi/4 and all of a sudden they've changed the complex number into it's negative, 1+i.

How does one avoid this dilemma?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thanks :smile:
 
Mentallic said:
When given a complex number z=x+iy and transforming this into its mod-arg form giving rcis\theta where r=\sqrt{(x^2+y^2)} and \theta=arctan(y/x), we are assuming that -\pi/2<\theta<\pi/2.

What if however a student is asked to convert the complex number -1-i into mod-arg form? If they just start to plug-and-chug they'll quickly end up with the result \theta=\pi/4 and all of a sudden they've changed the complex number into it's negative, 1+i.

How does one avoid this dilemma?
Be careful with the angle domain. You have a semicircle, while it should be a full circle. The signs of x and y have to be taken into account so that you end up in the correct quadrant.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top