How Do You Derive the Lorentz Transformation for Frame S''?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lorentz transformation for frame S'' in terms of frames S and S', where S' moves at speed V1 and S'' at speed V2. The transformation equations are applied twice to express coordinates x'', y'', etc., in terms of x, y, z, and t. The key point is to show that the resulting transformation aligns with the standard Lorentz transformation using the relativistic sum of velocities. Participants express confusion over the algebraic manipulation required to reconcile the gamma factors and the relativistic speeds. The consensus is to simplify the gamma factor for combined velocities and focus on the algebraic relationships involved.
brainpushups
Messages
452
Reaction score
195

Homework Statement



Frame S' travels at speed V1 along the x-axis of frame S. Frame S'' travels at speed V2 along the x' axis of frame S'. Apply the Lorentz transformation twice to find the coordinates x'', y'', etc of any event in terms of x, y, z, t. Show that this is the same as the standard Lorentz transformation with velocity V given by the relativistic sum of V1 and V2



Homework Equations



\x'=\gamma(x-Vt)
\t'=\gamma(t'-\frac{Vx}{c^{2}})
\v_{x}'=\frac{v_{x}-V}{1-\frac{v_{x}V}{c^{2}}}



The Attempt at a Solution




No problem with the first part. I'll just put my answer for the x'' coordinate for reference:

\x''=\gamma_{1}\gamma_{2}(x(1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{c^{2}})-(V_{1}+V_{2})t)

The different gamma factors come from transforming between S and S' and then again between S' and S''

For showing that this is equivalent to applying the Lorentz transformation using the relativistic sum:

\x''=\gamma(x-Vt)=\gamma(x-\frac{V_{1}+V_{2}}{1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{c^{2}}}t)

This is almost in the correct form. If I kill the fraction I can get

\x''(1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{c^{2}})=\gamma(x(1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{c^{2}})-(V_{1}+V_{2})t)

The only differences between this and the expression I am looking for is the extra factor by x'' and the fact that the factor gamma should be the product of two gamma factors. I figured I could write the gammas explicitly in terms of V1 and V2 in my first equation for x’’ and then do the same in the second equation by substituting the relativistic sum for V and then rearrange things until I got the extra factor next to x’’ in the second equation to cancel. I worked through the algebra for a little while, but it didn't seem like it was going to happen. I just want to make sure I'm not overlooking something before I continue with the algebraic gymnastics. If I’m on the right track please confirm and I’ll continue to work at it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything looks OK. I would suggest that you now try to simplify ##\sqrt{1-\frac{V^2}{c^2}}## where V is the relativistic sum of V1 and V2.
 
Have you figured out the issue with gamma? I am also very confused about this question.
 
TSny said:
Everything looks OK. I would suggest that you now try to simplify ##\sqrt{1-\frac{V^2}{c^2}}## where V is the relativistic sum of V1 and V2.
I cannot get it. I try to calculate
γ1γ2 with V1 = V2 = 0.8c and its relativistic speed.
It found that the equation could not hold.
 
xiaozegu said:
I cannot get it. I try to calculate
γ1γ2 with V1 = V2 = 0.8c and its relativistic speed.
It found that the equation could not hold.

Everything should work out. I'm not sure exactly what you have done. Can you show us the details of your work?
 
brainpushups said:
I worked through the algebra for a little while, but it didn't seem like it was going to happen. I just want to make sure I'm not overlooking something before I continue with the algebraic gymnastics. If I’m on the right track please confirm and I’ll continue to work at it.

It is just algebraic gymnastics. However, I'd suggest just working on the γ factor for the combined velocities first. And, perhaps, working on ##\frac{1}{\gamma ^2}## makes it slightly easier.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top