How do you determine the cube root of (-1+i) in complex numbers?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the cube root of the complex number (-1+i), it is essential to convert it into polar form, represented as r e^(iθ). The process involves taking the cube root of the radius (r) and dividing the angle (θ) by 3, following the principles of exponent laws and De Moivre's formula. This method ensures that the cube root of the complex number is accurately calculated as √[3]{r} e^(iθ/3). Understanding this approach clarifies the reasoning behind manipulating both the radius and angle during the calculation. The discussion highlights the importance of these mathematical concepts in solving complex number problems effectively.
rpardo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm doing some practice problems for my mechanics exam tomorrow (good ol' SHM) and I can't solve this for the life of me:

Determine: (-1+i)^(1/3)

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Write (-1 + i) in polar form (rexp(itheta)). Then multiply the angle by 1/3, and take the cube root of the radius.
 
Thanks very much for the answer. IT WORKS!
However, I don't understnad why/how. Whats is the reasoning behind multiplying then angle and then cube rooting the radius?
 
Think about the laws of exponents. If -1 + i = r e^{ i \theta }, then (-1 + i)^{ \frac{ 1 }{ 3 } } = ( r e^{ i \theta } )^{ \frac{ 1 }{ 3 } } = \sqrt[3]{r} ( e^{ i \theta } )^{ \frac{ 1 }{ 3 } } = \sqrt[3]{r} e^{ i \frac{ \theta }{ 3 } }.
 
Taking the cube root of the radius should be obvious. The radius is a real number, and the cube root satisfies (AB)^1/3 = A^1/3 * B^1/3. Diving the angle by 3 is an application of De Moivre's formula:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Moivre's_formula
 
rpardo said:
Thanks very much for the answer. IT WORKS!
However, I don't understnad why/how. Whats is the reasoning behind multiplying then angle and then cube rooting the radius?

To multiply two complex numbers in polar form a \angle b^\circ and c \angle d^\circ, you multiply the radii (a x c) and add the angles (b + d), so the product is ac \angle (b+d)^\circ

Cubing a complex number a \angle b^\circ is then (aaa) \angle(b+b+b)^\circ = a^3 \angle(3b)^\circ

So, to find the cube root of a complex number, you can see that you take the cube root of the radius and divide the angle by 3.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top