How Do You Draw a Bode Plot for a Given Transfer Function?

Click For Summary
To draw a Bode plot for the given transfer function, start by identifying the individual components and their contributions to the overall plot. The first graph should represent the amplification factors, while the second graph sums these components. Key points include determining corner frequencies and slopes, with -20 dB/decade and -40 dB/decade slopes indicating how the plot changes. Calculating where the lines intersect the x-axis is crucial for accuracy, as these points define the transition between different slopes. Understanding the behavior of the transfer function at low and high frequencies will help in sketching the combined graph accurately.
  • #31
I think you'll find that the factored version of the transfer function spells out the poles conveniently in terms of the natural angular frequency (rad/sec).

Then this logic does not match Nascent's graph who posted right before you. The break point seems to be at 0.1

the slope increases by 40 db/decade

Increase or decrease - that depends whether this expression is in the nominator or denominator
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Femme_physics said:
Then this logic does not match Nascent's graph who posted right before you. The break point seems to be at 0.1
Right. His graph has frequency f in Hz along the x-axis. Natural frequency ω is in rad/sec, where ##ω = 2\pi f##.
Increase or decrease - that depends whether this expression is in the nominator or denominator
Heh. Yes, by "increase" I meant steeper descent for each pole. Zeros in the numerator have the opposite effect, tilting the slope upwards by 20 db/decade for each zero.
 
  • #33
Femme_physics said:
Then this logic does not match Nascent's graph who posted right before you. The break point seems to be at 0.1
That's because gneill helpfully threw in a new transfer function, for clarity.
Increase or decrease - that depends whether this expression is in the nominator or denominator
Certainly.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
NascentOxygen said:
That's because gneill helpfully invented another transfer function, for clarity.
Ah yes, er, that too :smile:

Actually I went back to the original transfer function for the thread, since I though it might be helpful to compare with the related plots.
 
  • #35
gneill said:
I went back to the original transfer function for the thread, since I though it might be helpful to compare with the related plots.
The original TF had poles at -1 and -4. Though easy to get confused here, I know. :wink:
 
  • #36
NascentOxygen said:
The original TF had poles at -1 and -4. Though easy to get confused here, I know. :wink:

Aurrgh! So much for short term memory. Heck, it was only three pages ago, too!
 
  • #38
The way I described it, is how I learned it some time ago.

However, after gneill's and NascO's comments, I've looked it up on wiki, and I found this section on how to draw Bode plots by hand:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bode_plot#Rules_for_handmade_Bode_plot
This is basically what they already said.

In the end I believe it is somewhat arbitrary, since the real transfer function plot does not consist of straight lines.
But I certainly concur that we should follow the standard methods.

Here's the graph I've made with the "actual" transfer function for ##G(s)={400 \over (s+1)(s+4)}##, my version, and NascO/gneill's version.

attachment.php?attachmentid=55077&stc=1&d=1359286223.jpg


As you can see, it doesn't really matter (my version is actually closer), but I do propose to follow NascO/gneill's suggestions.
 

Attachments

  • Bode_in_Hebrew2.jpg
    Bode_in_Hebrew2.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 562
  • #39
Well, now that ILS has cleared that up... :wink:

there is no stopping yet, because as I pointed out earlier, we are only halfway there!

http://physicsforums.bernhardtmediall.netdna-cdn.com/images/icons/icon2.gif Don't forget that the Bode Plot requires a plot of angle vs. frequency as well as dB vs. frequency.

BTW, I think we have left FemmePhysics some miles back along the way. Should we turn back to look for her?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
NascentOxygen said:
BTW, I think we have left FemmePhysics some miles back along the way. Should we turn back to look for her?

I'm sure that FP will track us down in due course. Probably just waiting for the dust to settle :smile:
 
  • #41
I'm here! Except, I already had the Control Systems semester test yesterday. The sad part is that everything BUT the Bode Plot I'm sure I got right ;) But at least I didn't have to DRAW a graph, the graphs were given to me, I just had to find the function that describes it. So far I'm able to keep a 90+ average (out of a 100) with the help of physicsforums, or most specific you guys.
I had some solved examples to work with...hopefully I got it right. I might approach this thread before the final test of my degree (May-July), provided you'll still be around :)

I really appreciate your help, especially ILS that always goes above and beyond (amazing). If I didn't get the bode plots right I'll come here to whine, rest be assured!

Now I have machine parts test to take in 5 days so I better get in shape. :-) I appreciate your help, guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K