How Do You Evaluate the Integral of arcsec(x) from sqrt(2) to 2?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral of arcsec(x) from sqrt(2) to 2, specifically focusing on the integral of the function 1 over x*sqrt(t² - 1) dx. Participants are exploring the correct interpretation and evaluation of this integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the presence of two variables in the integral, particularly the role of 't' and whether it can be treated as a constant. There are requests for more clarity and elaboration on the evaluation process. Some participants discuss the evaluation of arcsec at specific limits and suggest alternative approaches involving trigonometric substitutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and raising questions about the integral's setup and evaluation. There is no explicit consensus, but various interpretations and methods are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential confusion regarding variable usage and limits of integration, as well as the implications of using trigonometric identities in the evaluation process.

frasifrasi
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
For the integral from sqrt(2) to 2

of
1 over x*sqrt(t^(2) - 1) dx

I noticed that this was just the arcsece, so I got arcsec(x) for the answer, but how would I evaluated this at 2 and sqrt(2)?


What did i do wrong?


Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are there 2 variables in your integral? Is t supposed to be there? Can it be treated as a constant for this question?
 
more clarity and a little more work would be appreciated
 
Ok, the integral is:

1 over x*sqrt(x^(2) - 1) dx


--> which I evaluated to be arcsec (x),but this doesn't make sense with the limits of integration...
 
Well if you want to find arcsec(\sqrt{2}) you can always work it out like this:

Let \alpha=sec^{-1}(\sqrt{2})

so that sec\alpha=\sqrt{2}
and therefore cos\alpha=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} and then you find \alphaOR...somewhere in you attempt you would have used the substitution x=sec\theta so from there you could have gotten \theta=cos^{-1}(\frac{1}{x}) and use that instead of arcsec
 
Oh my god!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K