How Do You Find the Inverse of a Function in Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sonya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
AI Thread Summary
To find the inverse of the function f(x) = (2e^x - 8)/(10e^x + 9), the correct approach involves rearranging the equation before applying the natural logarithm. By multiplying both sides by (10e^x + 9) and simplifying, the equation can be transformed into 10e^xy - 2e^x = - (8 + 9y). This leads to isolating e^x, resulting in e^x = (9y + 8)/(2 - 10y). Taking the natural logarithm of both sides yields x = ln[(9y + 8)/(2 - 10y)], thus the inverse function is f^(-1)(x) = ln[(9x + 8)/(2 - 10x)]. The discussion highlights the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in finding function inverses.
sonya
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
calculus help please!

if f(x)= (2e^x -8)/(10e^x + 9)
then wat is f^(-1)(x)?

i first took the ln of both sides...

getting lny = ln (2e^x - 8)/(10e^x + 9)

then using one of the properties i get

lny = ln (2e^x - 8) - ln (10e^x + 9)

and from here i get stuck...how do i solve for x?? am i doing it a totally wrong way?? please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pretty much, yeah, you're doing it the wrong way.

Instead of starting right off with the ln (which doesn't really help, does it?) you might want to simplfy the problem a bit first.

Since y= (2ex- 8)/(10ex+9),
(10ex+ 9)y= 2ex- 8
10exy+ 9= 2ex-8

Now subtract 9 and 2ex from both sides of the equation:
10y ex- 2ex= -17 or

(10y- 2)ex= -17

Divide both sides by 10y- 2 to isolate the exponential:

ex= -17/(10y-2)= 17/(2- 10y)

FINALLY, take the ln of both sides:

x= ln(17/(2-10y)) so the inverse function is

f-1(x)= ln(17/(2-10x)) where defined.
 
Originally posted by HallsofIvy
Since y= (2ex- 8)/(10ex+9),
(10ex+ 9)y= 2ex- 8
10exy+ 9= 2ex-8

er...wat happened to the y? shouldn't it b 9y when u expand the y thru the brackets??
 
Last edited:
ne1??
 
y= (2e^x - 8)/(10e^x + 9)

(10e^x+ 9)y= 2e^x- 8

10e^xy + 9y = 2e^x - 8

10e^xy-2e^x = - (8 + 9y)

e^x = (9y + 8)/(2 - 10y)

Take ln on both sides
x = ln [(9y + 8)/(2 - 10y)]

so,
f-1(x) = ln[(9y + 8)/(2 - 10y)]

er...wat happened to the y? shouldn't it b 9y when u expand the y thru the brackets??
Yes, that should be 9y. HallsofIvy only made a careless mistake and the way I do this question is exactly the same as that of HallsofIvy.
 
Yes, that should be 9y. HallsofIvy only made a careless mistake

Well, yeah, I did that to see if you were paying attention.

You BELIEVE that, don't you?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top